Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158073

Table 1. Results of two-way ANOVAs (a-b, d-f) and mixed model (c) performed on morphological measurements.

Effect a) Forewing length Group1 b) Eye area Group1 c) Facet size Group1
df num df res F P df num df res F P df num df res F P
Species 1 60 99.51 <.0001 1 60 10.16 0.0023 1 812 10.65 0.0011
Sex 1 60 31.27 <.0001 1 60 647.87 <.0001 1 812 168.15 <.0001
Species*Sex 1 60 5.52 0.0221 1 60 3.56 0.0641 1 812 1.17 0.2792
Region / / / / / / / / 3 812 375.65 <.0001
Species*Region / / / / / / / / 3 812 5.05 0.0018
Sex*Region / / / / / / / / 3 812 98.52 <.0001
Species*Sex*Region / / / / / / / / 3 812 1.92 0.1245
d) Forewing length Group2 e) Thorax volume Group2 f) Wing loading Group2
df num df res F P df num df res F P df num df res F P
Species 1 478 901.77 <.0001 1 478 179.89 <.0001 1 478 64.06 <.0001
Sex 1 478 120.82 <.0001 1 478 87.56 <.0001 1 478 56.68 <.0001
Species*Sex 1 478 61.42 <.0001 1 478 26.68 <.0001 1 478 10.80 0.0011

Two-way ANOVAs including the effects of species, sex and species x sex interaction were used for forewing length in Group1 (a), eye area in Group1 (b), forewing length in Group2 (d), thorax volume in Group2 (e) and wing loading in Group2 (f). A mixed model including species, sex, eye region and their two- and three-way interactions as fixed effects was used for the of the facet size in Group1 (c). In this case, individual was added as a random intercept in the model.