Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2016 Jun 2;52(7):1115–1127. doi: 10.1037/dev0000136

Table 6.

Unconditional Latent Class Growth Models by Gender.

				Family Conflict
		Males				Females
	High Decreasing	High Stable	Low Decreasing	Low Increasing	Low Decreasing	Low Increasing	High Decreasing	High Increasing
Means
Intercept	2.69 (.23)^***	2.30 (.22)^***	1.65 (.03)^***	1.66 (.08)^***	1.64 (.03)^***	1.89 (.09)^***	2.70 (.08)^***	2.44 (.24)^***
Slope	−.35 (.06)^***	.19 (.12)	−.12 (.01)^***	.11 (.06)^*	−.12 (.01)^***	.15 (.06)^*	−.40 (.04)^***	.20 (.07)^**
Number of subjects (%)	18 (3.5%)	12 (2.3%)	169 (32.9%)	40 (7.8%)	172 (33.5%)	51 (9.9%)	31 (6.0%)	20 (3.9%)
Entropy				.89
Goodness of Fit
Loglikelihood				−1748.34
Bayesian (BIC)				3646.44

				Parent Support
		Males				Females
	High Decreasing	High Stable	Low Stable	Low Increasing	Low Stable	Low Increasing	High Decreasing	High Stable
Means
Intercept	3.93 (.12)^***	4.44 (.05)^***	1.50 (.28)^***	2.70 (.25)^***	2.07 (.23)^***	2.58 (.26)^***	3.54 (.19)^***	4.42 (.05)^***
Slope	−.27 (.08)^**	.01 (.02)	.15 (.09)	.38 (.12)^**	−.10 (.11)	.50 (.13)^***	−.38 (.10)^***	.01 (.02)
Number of subjects (%)	42 (8.2%)	160 (31.2%)	9 (1.8%)	28 (5.5%)	10 (1.9%)	57 (11.1%)	45 (8.8%)	162 (31.6%)
Entropy				.90
Goodness of Fit
Loglikelihood				−2702.55
Bayesian (BIC)				5554.87

^*

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001