Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Lett. 2015 Dec 23;381(1):244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.12.020

Table 1.

The objective response rates of “immune active” tumors and “immune quiescent” tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Classification Tumor type Objective Response Rates References
Immune active tumors Melanomas (with a combinational treatment of nivolumab and ipilimumab) 53% Wolchok et al., 2013
Non-small cell lung cancer (Squamous cell type) 20% Brahmer et al., 2015
Non-small cell lung cancer (Adenocarcinoma) 19.2% Paz-Ares et al., 2015
Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (PD-L1+ tumor) 22% Muro et al., 2015
Colorectal carcinoma (MSI tumors) 40% Le et al., 2015a
Renal cell cancer 20–30% Motzer et al., 2015; McDermott et al., 2015
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck 18.2% Seiwert et al., 2015
Hepatocellular carcinoma 23% El-Khoueiry et al., 2015
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma 87% Ansell et al., 2015
Immune quiescent tumors Pancreatic adenocarcinoma ~0% Brahmer et al., 2012
Colorectal carcinoma (MSS tumors) 0% Le et al., 2015a
Non-responsive melanoma, NSCLC, GA, RCC, SCCHN, HCC, etc. 0% See above

NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; GA, gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; MSI, microsatellite instable; MSS, microsatellite stable.