Table 3.
Enteric conversion: Literature review
| Center, authors, year, ref., and study design | Overall rate (%) | Urologic indications # (%) | Metabolic indications # (%) | Pancreatitis/other indications # (%) | Operative complications # (%) |
| University of Wisconsin, Van der Werf et al[79], Retrospective | 95/449 (21%) | 90 (95) | 1 (1) | 4 (4) | 21 (22) |
| Sollinger et al[80], Retrospective | 160/390 (41%) | 93 (58) | 1 (0.6) | 47 (29) | ND |
| University of Minnesota, West et al[81], Retrospective | 79/500 (16%) | 43 (54) | 26 (33) | 15 (19) | 12 (15) |
| University of Nebraska, Sindhi et al[82], Retrospective | 25/195 (13%) | 7 (28) | 18 (72) | 0 | 3 (12) |
| University of Barcelona, Spain, Fernandez-Cruz et al[83], Retrospective | 16/74 (22%) | 0 | 0 | 16 (100) | Death 1 (6); Wound infection 2 (12); Anastomotic leak 3 (18) |
| Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands, van de Linde et al[84], Retrospective | 51/ND | 39 (76) | 23 (45) | Pancreatitis 2 (3); Fistula 1 (1) | UTI 7 (13); Minor bleeding 1 (0.5); Phlebitis 1 (0.5); Paralytic ileus 1 (0.5); Relaparotomy 2 (3) |
| University of Cincinnati, Kaplan et al[85], Retrospective | 26 (32%) | 13 (50) | 13 (50) | 0 | Death 1 (3); Anastomotic bleeding 1 (3) |
| Beaumont Hospital, Ireland, Connolly et al[86], Retrospective | 6/ND | 3 (50); 2 hematuria; 1 UTI | 3 (50) | ND | Pulmonary edema 1 (16) |
UTI: Urinary tract infection; ND: Not determined/no data.