Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;8(6):618–627. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.618

Table 6.

Mean HU values and objective image noise in region of interest placed in liver for standard of care filtered back projection and reduced dose iterative reconstruction techniques

HU values Objective image noise
Vendor A SD FBP 104 ± 30 17 ± 3
RD A-1 93 ± 35 16 ± 4
RD A-2 97 ± 29 19 ± 4
RD A-3 98 ± 29 (P = 0.9) 24 ± 5 (P < 0.001)
Vendor B SD FBP 101 ± 28 26 ± 5
RD B-1 100 ± 25 29 ± 5
RD B-2 98 ± 24 14 ± 3
RD B-3 107 ± 23 (P = 0.3) 33 ± 11 (P < 0.001)
Vendor C SD FBP 103 ± 28 23 ± 7
RD C-1 97 ± 26 36 ± 18
RD C-2 97 ± 26 28 ± 14
RD C-3 98 ± 25 (P = 0.9) 23 ± 11 (P = 0.016)

FBP: Filtered back projection; SD: Standard of care; RD: Reduced dose.