Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;7:792. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00792

Table 2.

Environmental risks and likelihood of risks on the use of candidate abiotic stress tolerance genes in transgenic plants.

Transgene/protein Potential hazard/risk Likelihood of risks
codA (encoded protein/Glycine betaine) Confers selective advantage, fitness, better plant growth may increase competitive potential of crop plants
Allelopathic effect on surrounding plant vegetation and soil microbe diversity and functions
Changes in salt tolerance may affect structure and functions of soil microbes
Selective advantage is limited, only under stress condition
No competitiveness, weediness in crop plants
No known adverse/allelopathic effects
Metabolic changes, allelochemicals may have effects
Unknown effects on rhizosphere microbes through changed salt tolerance, water and nutrients
DREBs/transcription factor proteins Confers selective advantage under stress condition
May have cross tolerance
May have unintended effects
These all factors may increase plant fitness
DREBs have no direct effects on plant diversity
Selective advantage is limited and only under stress condition
Cross tolerance may involve physiological, metabolic burdens, reduced fitness
Increased fitness or differences in fitness and weediness traits, may not affect biodiversity
May affect microbe diversity through changed soil abiotic condition
Na+/H+ antiporters May confer selective advantage, improved phenotype
Increased fitness may increase persistence and competitive ability of crop plants
Selective advantage and improved phenotype may affect rhizosphere microbes and their functions
These genes and the encoded proteins are native to plants
Selective advantage is limited that may not change persistence and volunteer potential
Changed salt tolerance may have effects on soil microbes through changed water and nutrients