Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;6(1):010503. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010503

Table 1.

The differences in median scores (with inter–quartile range, IQR) that different sub–groups of scorers (ie, researchers vs “non–researchers”; and high–income country (HIC)–based vs low– or middle–income country (LMIC–based) assigned to different criteria*

All scorers (median, IQR) (N = 91) Researchers (median, IQR) (N = 61) “Non–researchers” (N = 30) HIC–based (median, IQR) (n = 53) LMIC–based (median, IQR) (n = 38)
Total score
63 (54–71)
62 (54–70)
64 (53–73)
57 (47–66)
72 (61–80)
Answerability
76 (68–83)
76 (68–84)
77 (67–85)
74 (63–81)
81 (73–89)
Effectiveness
70 (61–77)
69 (61–78)
68 (59–78)
66 (54–74)
76 (66–84)
Deliverability
69 (58–77)
69 (59–78)
67 (57–78)
65 (54–72)
77 (65–84)
Maximum impact
42 (32–52)
39 (32–50)
44 (32–55)
32 (23–41)
54 (44–66)
Equity 57 (47–70) 57 (46–66) 60 (46–75) 48 (37–61) 72 (60–81)

IQR – interquartile range, HIC – high–income, LMIC – low– and middle–income

*The median scores were determined across all 205 research ideas in order to investigate if any sub–group of scorers deviated in their scoring of any particular criterion.