Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;8:69–74. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S105395

Table 1.

Characteristics of study collective

Characteristics Overall cTACE DEB-TACE P-value
Patients, n (%)
 Total 32 (100) 18 (56.3) 14 (43.8) 0.854
 Male 30 (93.8) 17 (94.4) 13 (92.9)
Female 2 (6.3) 1 (5.6) 1 (7.1)
Age (years)
Mean 66.8 68.5 64.7 0.2613
Tumor burden, n (%)
Unilobar 12 (37.5) 7 (38.8) 5 (35.7) 0.854
Bilobar 20 (62.5) 11 (61.1) 9 (64.3)
Multinodular (≥4 nodes) 19 (59.4) 8 (44.4) 11 (78.6) 0.0512
Okuda stage,a n (%)
I 12 (40.0) 7 (43.8) 5 (35.7) 0.7398
II 15 (50.0) 7 (43.8) 8 (57.1)
III 3 (10.0) 2 (12.5) 1 (7.1)
Child-Pugh class,a n (%)
A 21 (67.7) 10 (58.8) 11 (78.6) 0.3200
B 8 (25.8) 5 (29.7) 3 (21.4)
C 2 (6.5) 2 (11.8) 0 (0.0)
MELD scorea
Mean 10.0 11.1 8.8 0.0771
Targeted therapy, n (%)
Sorafenib after initial TACE 14 (41.4) 6 (33.3) 8 (57.1) 0.1780

Note:

a

In up to two cases, patients could not be classified due to missing data.

Abbreviations: cTACE, conventional transarterial chemoembolization; DEB-TACE, transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads; MELD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.