Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158312

Fig 1. Experimental design.

Fig 1

A) Visual performance on face processing was assessed before (pre-stimulation) and after (post-stimulation) passive visual stimulation with two different protocols (LTP-like or LTD-like). B) Face identity change detection task used in Experiments 1–3. In a sequence of screens, relevant (face identity) and/or irrelevant (face orientation) changes were randomly presented in each hemifield. Each condition (“Relevant Change”, “Irrelevant Change”, “Competitive Change” and “Relevant with Irrelevant”; see Methods) was presented an equal number of trials. One ninth of the trials presented no changes (not shown). Note the challenging nature of the competitive change trials where task-relevant identity changes should be detected despite the presence of a distractor (irrelevant head-orientation change) in the opposite hemifield. The correct response for these example trials is indicated below each condition.