Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0158259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158259

Table 5. Clinical and demographic data for ordinary-luminal quantiles Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4.

METABRIC training METABRIC validation ROCK
Description Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p -value Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p -value Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 p -value
Size [mm] 23.1 23.2 28.7 27 6.3 ⋅ 10−6 21.3 24.5 25.7 27.8 6.6 ⋅ 10−6 20.1 (220) 20.4 (204) 21.8 (201) 22.6 (183) 0.02
Grade 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 1.2 ⋅ 10−22 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.5 ⋅ 10−24 1.8 (147) 2.1 (113) 2.3 (114) 2.6 (108) 5.3 ⋅ 10−20
NPI 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.7 ⋅ 10−15 3.2 3.7 3.9 4.3 5.1 ⋅ 10−18 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Age at diagnosis [y.] 63.1 63.2 63.6 64.3 0.92 61.2 64.5 64.4 64 0.74 54.6 (171) 56.2 (195) 56.6 (204) 56.1 (202) 0.52
Lymph nodes positive 1.1 1.4 2 2.2 0.053 1.1 1.2 1.8 2.2 0.12 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
PR+/all [%] 76% 76% 66% 60% 0.0029 78% 84% 65% 67% 1.1 ⋅ 10−4 86% (85) 88% (96) 84% (81) 68% (117) 0.0011
Lum A/all [%] 100% 94% 66% 15% 2.7 ⋅ 10−71 100% 94% 60% 7% 3.2 ⋅ 10−80 100% 90% 60% 10% 2.2 ⋅ 10−113
P53 mutated/all [%] 4% (72) 3% (64) 9% (75) 11% (64) 0.21 2% (54) 4% (89) 3% (72) 12% (65) 0.035 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10-year survival rate 0.92 (148) 0.81 (147) 0.72 (146) 0.62 (147) 2.1 ⋅ 10−6 0.87 (138) 0.79 (167) 0.67 (140) 0.58 (136) 5.7 ⋅ 10−9 0.83 (214) 0.81 (195) 0.63 (186) 0.49 (168) 3.7 ⋅ 10−18
Lower limit 0.87 0.74 0.64 0.54 0.81 0.71 0.59 0.5 0.76 0.75 0.56 0.41
Upper limit 0.98 0.89 0.8 0.72 0.95 0.87 0.77 0.69 0.9 0.88 0.72 0.58
Population 158 157 157 157 147 183 155 144 244 244 244 243

The mean values of tumour size, grade, NPI, the average numbers of positive lymph nodes, and patients’ mean age for the ordinary-luminal quantiles Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 are listed in this table. The ratios of IHC PR- and HER2-positively measured cases, the prevalence of a p53 mutation, and the constitution of luminal A labels within each group, are provided as percentages. P-values indicating the significance of the difference between the results are also provided for each data set, where the multidimensional Kruskal-Wallis test (one-way ANOVA on ranks) was applied to numeric parameters and the Proportion test—to Boolean given as percentages. The survival rates correspond to prognostic probabilities, where 1 is the perfect prediction and 0 stands for a certain death; the lower and upper limits correspond to the 95% confidence interval of each Kaplan-Meier curve; the overall Log-rank test p-values of survival curves stratification are listed for each data set. In the METABRIC data set the disease-specific survival information was considered, while in the ROCK data set it corresponds to relapse-free survival. The number of samples in each subgroup is denoted in the last row. Where the number of samples available for calculation of each characteristic was lower than 95% of the population, it is provided in parenthesis. “N/A” stands for “non-applicable” due to missing data.