Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 6;21(4):e494–e504. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21139

Figure 1.

Figure 1

1. Risk of bias in studies included in the systematic review. - All the studies were considered low risk in terms of performance and detection bias, given that a double-blind design was a selection criterion for the meta-analysis. - In studies with a split-mouth design, it was considered that that there might be other sources of bias given the duration of the washout period (no more than 4 weeks in all cases).