Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2016 Mar 23;59(1):17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.003

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios of district-level policies and student characteristics on daily regular soda consumption among high school students—12 large urban school districts, 2013

Characteristic AOR (95% CI)a
Nutrition education
  Yes 1.11 (.93–1.33)
  No Referent
Closed campus
  Yes 1.23 (1.02–1.48)
  No Referent
Offer healthful alternatives
  Recommend/require   .76 (.63–.91)
  Neither Referent
Restrict promotional products
  Recommend/require   .84 (.71–1.00)
  Neither Referent
Restrict sale of beverages
  Recommend/require   .72 (.56–.93)
  Neither Referent
Percent of students eligible to receive free and reduced-price lunch
  1st tertile Referent
  2nd tertile 1.14 (.94–1.40)
  3rd tertile   .85 (.72–1.00)
Sex
  Female Referent
  Male 1.25 (1.16–1.35)
Grade
  9 Referent
  10   .88 (.77–1.00)
  11   .87 (.74–1.02)
  12   .85 (.74–.98)
Race/ethnicity
  White, non-Hispanic Referent
  Black, non-Hispanic 1.46 (1.23–1.72)
  Hispanic 1.31 (1.13–1.53)
  Asian, non-Hispanic   .67 (.52–.88)
  Other, non-Hispanic 1.31 (.99–1.72)
Weight status
  Underweight 1.26 (1.00–1.58)
  Normal weight Referent
  Overweight   .98 (.85–1.12)
  Obese 1.04 (.93–1.17)
Participate in at least 60 minutes of physical activity per day
  Yes 1.06 (.94–1.19)
  No Referent
Watch 3 or more hours of TV per day
  Yes 1.89 (1.70–2.09)
  No Referent
Use computers 3 or more hours per day
  Yes 1.43 (1.29–1.59)
  No Referent
Observations 23,196

AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

a

The logistic regression model included all five policy variables, district-level participation in free and reduced-price lunch, and student-level characteristics.