Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;5(1):874. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2594-6

Table 1.

Results of GDA on spontaneously discharged POC

Case Maternal age(years) Gestational weeks Position of copy-number changes Estimated karyotype (gendera)
Gain Loss
1 37 6 22q11.1q11.22, 22q13.31 Trisomy 22 (F)
2 33 5 1p36.33p36.32 1p36 deletion (M)
3 38 5 Normal (F)
4 37 6 Normal (F)
5 37 6 11p13p12, 11q25 Trisomy 11 (M)
6 36 5 16p13.3, 16q24.3 Trisomy 16 (F)
7 33 6 21q22.13q22.2, 21q22.3 Monosomy 21 (M)
8 36 5 Normal (F)
9 37 5 22q11.1q11.21, 22q13.31q13.32 Trisomy 22 (F)
10 36 5 2p25.3, 2p11.2, 2q11.1q11.2, 2q22.3, 2q37.3 Trisomy 2 (M)
11 39 5 15q11.2q12, 15q24.1, 15q26.3 Trisomy 15 (M)b
12 40 6 21q11.2, 21q21.3, 21q22.13q22.2, 21q22.3 Monosomy 21 (M)
13 39 8 15q11.2q13.1, 15q24.1q24.2, 15q26.3 Trisomy 15 (M)
14 29 9 Normal (M)
15 28 7 Normal (M)b

aEstimated gender of POC; M = male, F = female. bCases 11 and 15 showed unsatisfactory signals on X/Y regions, suggesting to be mosaicism of XX and XY resulted from contamination with maternal DNA or triploidy as 70,XXY, + 15, 69,XXY, respectively. Two women had undergone miscarriage twice during this study and provided both miscarriage specimens: Cases 1/5 and Cases 2/7. Cases 1–6 were analyzed by GDA Ver. 2 (550BACs), Cases 7–9 by GDA Ver. 3 (660BACs) and Cases 10–15 by GD-700 (712BACs)