Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;18:251–260. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0176-2

Table 1.

Overview of the characteristics of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity studies

Ross et al. [8] Pussegoda et al. [9] Yang et al. [19] Lanvers-Kaminsky et al. [21] Hagleitner et al. [20] Xu et al. [22]
Discovery Replication Radiation No radiation Spanish Dutch Discovery Replication
Number of patients 53 109 155 213 41 63 38 110 238 68
Treatment protocols NS NS NS SJMB-96; SJMB-03 SJNB-97; SJNB-05; SJOS-08 COSS-82/86/91; NB-90; MAHO-94; MAKEI-89; HIT-91 NS NS SJMB-96; SJMB-03 SJYC-07
Age [y], median (range)
 Cases 5 (0–16) 6 (0–16) 6 (1–25) 7.6 (3.1–21.6) 3–12 (0.8–18) 11.8 (5–22) 11.5 (4–29) 15 (5–40) 8.5 ± 3.8b <5c
 Controls 9 (0–16) 9.5 (1–19) 11(0–18) 10.1 (3.3–19.8) 10 (2–13) 13.9 (5–20) 14 (7–28) 15 (7–39.3) 10.0 ± 4.3b
Sex, male [%] 67.9 57.8 49.7 66.2 70.7 60.3 55.3 50.0 62.2 NS
Ethnicity [%] Caucasian 79.0a Caucasian 80.0 White 78.9; non-white 21.1 White 61.0; non-white 39.0 NS European ancestry Dutch ancestry Mixed population NS
Cancer type Various cancers Various cancers Various cancers Medulloblastoma Neuroblastoma; osteosarcoma Various cancers (mainly osteosarcoma) Osteosarcoma Osteosarcoma Brain tumors Brain tumors
Follow up duration [y], median (range) or fixed number of years Cases: 3 (0–18); controls: 2 (0–15)a Cases: 5 (0–25); controls: 2 (0–16) 1.7 NS 2.5 NS 5.2 (0.06–21.3) 2.1 2.1
Craniospinal irradiation (%) 17.0 19.3 18.1 100 0 NS 0 0 100 NS
Concurrent drug therapy
 Use of ototoxic antibiotics Yes Yes Yes NS NS NS Yes No NS NS
 Vincristine (%) 39.5a 49.7 100 0 NS 15.8 4.5 100 100
Otoprotectants (%) NS NS NS 90.6 0 NS 0 0 >87 0
Cumulative cisplatin dose [mg/m2], median (range)
 Cases 360 (180–630) 400 (120–720) 400 (92–800) 300 (77–313) 390–618 (113–1105) 412 (120–644) 504 (120–870) 500 (100–600) 287 ± 35b ±300c
 Controls 360 (180–720) 410 (100–700) 400 (20–768) 300 (79–312) 254 (225–815) 418 (161–560) 515 (140–720) 480 (200–600) 289 ± 36b
Ototoxicity grading scale and comparison groups CTCAE >1 vs CTCAE = 0 CTCAE >1 vs CTCAE = 0 CTCAE >0 vs CTCAE = 0 + ordinal and Chang score = 0 vs >0; 2a vs ≥2a and ordinal CTCAE ordinal NS CTCAE >1 vs CTCAE = 0; SIOP Boston ototoxicity scale Chang score >0 vs Chang score = 0
Outcome
 Association COMT Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No
 Association TPMT Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No No

CTCAE common terminology criteria for adverse events, NS not specified, SIOP international society of pediatric oncology, y years

aBased on combined cohort (discovery + replication) [9]

bMean and standard deviation given instead of median and range

cBased on combined cohort (cases + controls)