Skip to main content
. 2016 May;13(4):333–343. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.03.020

Table 2. Quality assessment of case-control studies included in the meta-analysis, based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Study ID Selection
Comparability
Exposure
Total score
Case definition Adequate (maximum: ★) Representativeness of cases (maximum: ★) Selection of controls (maximum: ★) Definition of controls(maximum: ★) Comparability of cases and controls based on design or analysisDesign or Analysis (maximum: ★★)a Ascertainment of exposure (maximum: ★) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls (maximum: ★) Non-response rate (maximum: ★)
Cho, et al. [28] ★ for age 7
Barcelo, et al. [23] ★★ 7
Di Murro, et al. [29] ★★ 8
Svatikova, et al. [30] ★★ 7
Ishikawa[36] 6
Gjorup[31] ★ for age 8
Takahashi[39] ★★ 6
Yao[38] ★★ 6
Moller[32] ★ for age 6
Hu[33] 2
Xiao[34] ★★ 6
Maillard[35] ★★ 6

aStudies could receive 2-4 ★ for each item, except for “Comparability of cases and controls”, for which one ★ was awarded if the study controlled for age as the most important factor and another ★ if it controlled for BMI as an additional factor. BMI: body mass index.