Table 2. GLMM for the number of great tits at bird-feeders in relation to temperature, habitat (urban or rural), presence of novel object, density of great tits, number of cats, number of dogs, number of pedestrians and the interaction between habitat and presence of object as fixed effects.
Effects | Estimate | SE | z | P | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.399 | 0.324 | 1.233 | 0.218 | |
Novel object | −0.410 | 0.093 | −4.396 | <0.0001 | 0.348 |
Temperature | −0.017 | 0.010 | −1.769 | 0.077 | 0.140 |
Habitat: Urban | 0.315 | 0.091 | 3.466 | <0.0001 | 0.274 |
Early or late trial | 0.176 | 0.102 | 1.716 | 0.086 | 0.136 |
Density of great tits | 0.078 | 0.007 | 10.667 | <0.0001 | 0.843 |
No. species of birds | 0.058 | 0.013 | 4.451 | <0.0001 | 0.352 |
No. cats | 0.113 | 0.037 | 3.061 | 0.002 | 0.242 |
No. dogs | −0.124 | 0.023 | −5.317 | <0.0001 | 0.420 |
No. pedestrians | 0.009 | 0.003 | 3.490 | 0.005 | 0.276 |
Habitat * Novel object | 0.535 | 0.119 | 4.485 | <0.0001 | 0.355 |
City was used as a random effect with a variance of 1.16 and a standard deviation of 1.08. The number of observations was 160 and the number of cities 14. Effect size is the z-transformed Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. Statistically significant terms are shown in bold font.