Table 2. Identified regulatory regions were supported by experiments.
| Intersection | Intersection 85% | Union | Union 85% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #Predicted regions | 118 (31) | 270 (144) | 117 (52) | 218 (147) |
| #Predicted regions overlapping with Hi-C candidate regions | 114 (27) | 248 (122) | 114 (49) | 187 (116) |
| #Predicted regions overlapping with ChIA-PET candidate regions | 93 (25) | 196 (93) | 107 (46) | 158 (91) |
| #Predicted regions overlapping with candidate regions | 115 (28) | 250 (124) | 114 (49) | 189 (118) |
| #Random regions overlapping with Hi-C candidate regions | 7 (2) | 21 (12) | 9 (8) | 16 (12) |
| #Random regions overlapping with ChIA-PET candidate regions | 6 (2) | 31 (10) | 14 (8) | 20 (11) |
| #Random regions overlapping with candidate regions | 11 (3) | 37 (18) | 17 (12) | 26 (14) |
| Significance of the predicted regions overlapping with Hi-C candidate regions | 1.85E-136 (1.74E-30) | 1.23E-246 (2.66E-109) | 4.56E-125 (2.16E-38) | 3.79E-178 (6.36E-98) |
| Significance of the predicted regions overlapping with ChIA-PET candidate regions | 4.93E-098 (1.39E-26) | 1.40E-122 (6.21E-72) | 6.94E-088 (7.13E-33) | 4.62E-114 (4.14E-65) |
| Significance of the predicted regions overlapping with candidate regions | 1.65E-116 (1.48E-27) | 9.22E-190 (2.55E-91) | 2.27E-093 (1.14E-29) | 1.62E-142 (1.9E-93) |
Significance was calculated by binomial tests. One common regulatory region predicted for RPS11 and RPL13A was considered separately for these two genes. The numbers in the parentheses were for the distal regulatory or random regions.