Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;54(7):1738–1745. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00477-16

TABLE 2.

Antifungal MICs for B. mackinnonii, M. romeroi, R. rufulum, and Emarellia isolates

Species (no. of isolates) MIC (mg/liter)a
Source or reference
AMB ITC VRC CAS
Biatriospora mackinnoni (8) 0.77 (0.25–2) 0.65 (0.25–2) 0.59 (0.5–1) 8.72 (2–16) This study
Biatriospora mackinnoni (2) 0.71 (0.5–1) 0.5 (0.5) 0.18 (0.13–0.25) >16 (>16) 29
Medicopsis romeroi (9) 1.47 (0.125–4) 2 (1–4) 0.25 (0.125–0.5) 5.04 (4–8) This study
Medicopsis romeroi (5) 0.13 (0.13) 12.1 (0.5–>16) 0.17 (0.13–0.25) 16 (4–>16) 29
Medicopsis romeroi (1) 4 (4) 0.5 (0.5) 4 (4) 8 (8) 30
Medicopsis romeroi (1) 8 (8) 3 (3) 0.008 (0.008) 6 (6) 28
Rhytidhysteron rufulum (2) 0.25 (0.125–0.5) 0.71 (0.5–1) 0.18 (0.125–0.25) 0.25 (0.125–0.5) This study
Emarellia grisea (5) 0.76 (0.25–4) 0.25 (0.06–0.5) 0.19 (0.125–0.5) 9.19 (4–16) This study
Emarellia paragrisea (1) 1 (1) 0.125 (0.125) 0.125 (0.125) 8 (8) This study
a

Amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), and caspofungin (CAS) MICs were determined. Data represent geometric mean MICs (MIC ranges are indicated in parentheses). MIC values of >X were taken as the next highest doubling dilution for geometric mean MIC calculations.