Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;113(25):6886–6891. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523951113

Table 1.

Neolithic and Mesolithic samples analyzed

Site Culture Sample Age (cal BCE, 95.4% calibrated range) Genomic coverage (mean ± SD) Contamination estimate (mt) Sex mtDNA haplogroup Y haplogroup
Theopetra Mesolithic Theo5 7,605–7,529 1.84–6.71 K1c
Theopetra Mesolithic Theo1 7,288–6,771 0.05–3.8 K1c
Revenia Early Neolithic Rev5 6,438–6,264 1.16 ± 0.73 0.006–0.628 XX X2b *
Barcın Early Neolithic Bar31 6,419–6,238 3.66 ± 2.04 0.006–0.628 XY X2m G2a2b
Barcın Early Neolithic Bar8 6,212–6,030 7.13 ± 4.56 0.744–1.619 XX K1a2 *
Paliambela Late Neolithic Pal7 4,452–4,350 1.28 ± 1.01 0.006–0.772 XX J1c1 *
Kleitos Final Neolithic Klei10 4,230–3,995 2.01 ± 2.2 0.363–1.772 XY K1a2 G2a2a1b

Dates calibrated using Oxcal v4.2.2 and the Intcal13 calibration curve. For details on 14C dating and location of the sites (Fig. 1), see SI Appendix, SI1. Archaeological Background. Contamination was estimated on mitochondrial (mt) DNA. —, indicates no genomic data available; *, indicates not applicable.