. 2016 Feb 23;9(1):e3467. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-3467

Table 4. Adjusted and Unadjusted Odds Ratio of Studies Assessing the Association Between OGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Breast Cancer.

First Author	Menopausal Status	Cys/Cys Versus Ser/Ser^a		Ser /Cys Versus Ser/Ser^a		Cys/Cys and Ser /Cys Versus Ser/Ser^a
		Adjusted OR (95% CI)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Choi J. Y. (Korean) (2003) (43)
	Mix	1.20 (0.71 - 2.00)	-	0.90 (0.59 - 1.53)	-	-	0.94 (0.59 - 1.49)^b
	Pre	1.10 (0.57 - 2.22)	-	1.00 (0.56 - 1.93)	-	-	1.03 (0.55 - 1.91)^b
	Post	1.10 (0.46 - 2.45)	-	0.70 (0.34 - 1.63)	-	-	0.77 (0.37 - 1.64)^b
Choi J. Y. (Japanese) (2003) (43)
	Mix	1.70 (0.93 - 2.96)	-	1.20 (0.76 - 1.95)	-	-	1.28 (0.81 - 2.02)^b
	Pre	1.90 (0.75 - 4.90)	-	1.30 (0.63 - 2.69)	-	-	1.32 (0.65 - 2.66)^b
	Post	1.30 (0.61 - 2.98)	-	1.20 (0.64 - 2.42)	-	-	1.23 (0.65 - 2.34)^b
Vogel U. (2003) (26)	Post	-	0.98 (0.52 - 1.86)	-	0.84 (0.64 - 1.10)	-	0.85 (0.64 - 1.13)^b
Huang C. S. (2004) (52)	Mix	-	0.82 (0.42 - 1.61)^b	-	0.90 (0.48 - 1.71)^b	-	0.86 (0.48 - 1.58)^b
Cai Q. (2006) (25)
	Mix	1.06 (0.83 - 1.35)	-	1.17 (0.93 - 1.47)	-	-	1.10 (0.88 - 1.38)^b
	Pre	0.99 (0.74 - 1.34)	-	1.08 (0.81 - 1.43)	-	-	1.04 (0.79 - 1.37)^b
	Post	1.18 (0.77 - 1.81)	-	1.37 (0.91 - 2.07)	-	-	1.26 (0.84 - 1.88)^b
Rossner P., Jr. (2006) (76)	Mix	1.01 (0.68 - 1.52)	0.99 (0.66 - 1.47)	1.06 (0.88 - 1.28)	1.04 (0.87 - 1.24)	-	1.02 (0.86 - 1.22)^b
Zhang Y. (2006) (27)
	Mix	1.00 (0.70 - 1.40)	-	1.00 (0.80 - 1.20)	-	-	0.98 (0.83 - 1.14)^b
	Pre	0.90 (0.50 - 1.50)	-	1.10 (0.80 - 1.40)	-	-	1.02 (0.78 - 1.32)^b
	Post	1.20 (0.70 - 1.90)	-	1.00 (0.80 - 1.20)	-	-	1.01 (0.82 - 1.25)^b
Romanowicz-Makowska H. (2008) (75)	Post	-	0.62 (0.28 - 1.38)^b	-	0.40 (0.18 - 0.87)^b	-	0.49 (0.24 - 0.98)^b
Sangrajrang S. (2008) (29)
	Mix	1.42 (0.97 - 2.09)	1.46 (1.02 - 2.10)	0.95 (0.67 - 1.34)	0.99 (0.72 - 1.37)	-	1.14 (0.83 - 1.56)^b
	Pre	1.13 (0.67 - 1.91)	-	0.92 (0.58 - 1.48)	-	-	1.12 (0.72 - 1.73)^b
	Post	2.05 (1.14 - 3.69)	-	0.97 (0.58 - 1.61)	-	-	1.17 (0.72 - 1.89)^b
Synowiec E. (2008) (87)	Mix	-	0.22 (0.04 - 1.04)^b	-	0.33 (0.06 - 1.40)^b	-	0.28 (0.05 - 1.10)^b
Ming-Shiean (2010)H. (65)	Mix	1.09 (0.74 - 1.59)	1.09 (0.74 - 1.63)	0.97 (0.66 - 1.42)	0.99 (0.67 - 1.47)	1.04 (0.80 - 1.46)	1.02 (0.71 - 1.48)^b
Sterpone S. (2010) (38)	Mix	-	0.83 (0.10 - 6.65)	-	1.37 (0.53 - 3.56)	-	1.03 (0.46 - 3.64)^b
Roberts M. (2011)R. (72)
	Mix	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Pre	1.17 (0.53 - 2.54)	-	1.00 (0.72 - 1.38)	-	1.01 (0.74 - 1.38)	-
	Post	1.19 (0.77 - 1.85)	-	0.97 (0.79 - 1.19)	-	0.99 (0.82 - 1.21)	-
Kim K. Y. (2013) (57)	Mix	-	0.83 (0.53 - 1.30)^b	-	0.95 (0.66 - 1.38)^b	0.90 (0.64 - 1.27)	0.91 (0.64 - 1.30)^b
Xie H. (2013) (12)
	Mix	-	1.34 (0.97 - 1.84)	-	1.10 (0.82 - 1.49)	-	1.19 (0.88 - 1.60)^b
	Pre	-	1.87 (1.14 - 3.06)	-	1.08 (0.68 - 1.72)	-	1.34 (0.84 - 2.15)^b
	Post	-	1.18 (0.73 - 1.89)	-	1.02 (0.66 - 1.57)	-	1.07 (0.69 - 1.65)^b
Luo H. (2014) (61)
	Mix	0.69 (0.40 - 1.19)	-	0.82 (0.48 - 1.38)	-	0.76 (0.46 - 1.24)	-
	Pre	0.41 (0.14 - 1.18)	-	0.58 (0.21 - 1.64)	-	0.49 (0.19 - 1.27)	-
	Post	0.83 (0.40 - 1.70)	-	1.01 (0.51 - 1.99)	-	0.93 (0.49 - 1.76)	-
McCullough L. E. (2014) (63)	Post	-	-	-	-	-	0.98 (0.77 - 1.25)^b
Rodrigues P. (2014) (73)	Mix	-	-	-	-	1.82 (1.31 - 2.52)^c	-
Smolarz B. (2014) (85)	Mix	-	0.93 (0.34 - 2.51)	-	1.02 (0.45 - 2.34)	-	1.00 (0.42 - 2.37)^b

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

^aReferences category for calculation of odds ratio.

^bORs calculated by authors via Stata software (version 13).

^cCys/Cys versus Ser /Cys and Ser/Ser; Cys/Cys as reference category.