Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0653-6

Table 5.

Relative PPT changes during the application of noxious conditioning cold stimulus in healthy controls and patient groups diagnosed after each and combined examination modalities

TMJ Thenar
Controls (%) Arthralgia (%) OA (%) P value Controls (%) Arthralgia (%) OA (%) P value
Clinical diagnosis 33.1 ± 2.9 21.6 ± 3.8 32.1 ± 6.1 0.046* 13.8 ± 2.9 11.0 ± 1.7 11.9 ± 3.6 ns
CBCT 33.1 ± 2.9 22.9 ± 2.6 25.9 ± 5.9 ns 13.8 ± 2.9 11.5 ± 1.4 11.0 ± 2.7 ns
MRI 33.1 ± 2.9 23.2 ± 3.5 28.8 ± 8.6 ns 13.8 ± 2.9 10.7 ± 1.7 13.6 ± 3.7 ns
HR-US 33.1 ± 2.9 27.8 ± 4.1 20.7 ± 4.9 ˜ 0.074 13.8 ± 2.9 10.8 ± 1.8 11.8 ± 2.5 ns
Combined 33.1 ± 2.9 21.0 ± 3.6 32.4 ± 15.0 ns 13.8 ± 2.9 9.0 ± 1.8 19.1 ± 6.1 ns

Data are given as mean values (%) ± standard errors of mean

Abbreviations: PPT pressure pain threshold, TMJ temporomandibular joint, OA osteoarthritis, CBCT Cone beam computed tomography, MRI Magnetic resonance imaging, HR-US high resolution ultrasonography, ns not significant, ˜ tendency towards a significant difference

*P < 0.05 (t-test)