Skip to main content
. 2016 May 6;27:837–851. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0755-0

Table 2.

Summary table of meta-analyses of citrus fruits and esophageal and gastric cancers

Cancer type Esophageal cancer Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Esophageal adenocarcinoma Esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric cardia Gastric cancer Gastric cardia cancer Gastric non-cardia cancer
Linear dose–response meta-analysis per 100 g/day
No. of studies 6 3 3 3 6 3 4
No. of cases 1,057 320 422 1,348 4,907 555 1,317
Person-years 7,513,150 2,542,187 5,354,570 7,507,530 22,949,089 7,507,530 8,393,008
RR (95 % CI) 0.86 (0.74–1.00) 0.87 (0.69–1.08) 0.93 (0.78–1.11) 0.83 (0.67–1.02) 0.95 (0.85–1.05) 0.75 (0.55–1.01) 1.02 (0.90–1.16)
I 2, P heterogeneity 0 %, 0.83 23 %, 0.27 0 %, 0.58 50 %, 0.14 31 %, 0.21 55 %, 0.11 2 %, 0.40
Highest versus lowest analysis
No. of studies 7 3 3 3 6 3 4
No. of cases 1 158 320 422 1 348 4 907 555 1 317
RR (95 % CI) 0.77 (0.64–0.91) 0.65 (0.47–0.89) 0.78 (0.56–1.09) 0.67 (0.44–1.01) 0.95 (0.83–1.08) 0.62 (0.39–0.99) 1.01 (0.79–1.28)
I 2, P heterogeneity 5 %, 0.39 0 %, 0.60 29 %, 0.24 77 %, 0.01 57 %, 0.04 67 %, 0.05 47 %, 0.11