Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;7:1015. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01015

Table 7.

Result of three-way MANOVA for the PC1 and PC2 based on the data for all sampling days.

PC scores Source of variation df Sum of squares Mean squares Variance explained (%) F P
PC1 Strain (S) 1 2.79 2.79 <1 8.9 P < 0.050
Concentration (C) 2 4.15 2.08 <1 6.7 P < 0.050
Time (T) 4 489.69 122.42 92 395.0 P < 0.001
S × C 2 2.47 1.24 <1 3.9 P < 0.050
S × T 4 3.00 0.75 <1 2.4 P = 0.058
C × T 8 4.11 0.51 <1 1.7 P = 0.127
S × C × T 8 5.86 0.73 1 2.4 P < 0.050
PC2 Strain (S) 1 0.00 0.00 <1 0.0 P = 0.989
Concentration (C) 2 0.76 0.38 <1 0.2 P = 0.797
Time (T) 4 152.52 38.13 54 22.7 P < 0.001
S × C 2 2.28 1.14 <1 0.6 P = 0.512
S × T 4 1.51 0.38 <1 0.2 P = 0.924
C × T 8 12.47 1.56 4 0.9 P = 0.501
S × C × T 8 9.42 1.18 3 0.7 P = 0.690

The effects in bold are significant at P < 0.05.