Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;7:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00966

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients between the appraisals of the pain control goal on the one hand, and pain severity, attempts to control pain, meaningfulness of life despite pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing on the other hand.

N M (SD) Pain Severity (MPI) Solving pain (PaSol) Meaning-fulnessb (PaSol) Acceptance (PaSol) Catastrophizing (PCS)
Importanceb 73 5.66 (0.67) 0.02 0.26ˆ* 0.12 –0.09 –0.07
Difficultya 73 4.08 (1.57) 0.29ˆ* 0.09 –0.12 –0.20 0.19
Controlb 73 2.92 (1.67) –0.08 –0.03 0.20ˆ* 0.24ˆ** –0.16
Stressa 73 3.37 (1.70) 0.07 0.11 –0.18ˆ** –0.20 0.35ˆ**
Timeb 73 4.32 (1.51) 0.25ˆ** 0.32ˆ*** 0.04 –0.03 0.06
Progressb 73 2.74 (1.90) –0.18ˆ* –0.17 0.38ˆ*** 0.28ˆ** –0.28ˆ**
Self-Identitya 73 3.78 (1.79) –0.12 0.06 0.17 0.17 –0.20
Valueb 73 5.51 (0.99) 0.04 0.29ˆ** 0.16 0.10 –0.02

aPearson Correlations; bKendall’s tau correlations; PaSol, Pain Solutions Questionnaire; PCS, Pain Catastrophizing Scale. p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure