Table 4.
Results of correlational analyses between pain goal interference, facilitation and necessary condition, and solving pain, meaningfulness of life despite pain, acceptance, and catastrophizing.
| M (SD) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pain Goal Interferencea | 3.16 (1.04) | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.23+ | –0.08 | –0.21 | 0.09 |
| 2. Pain Goal Facilitationb | 4.00 (0.84) | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.26∗∗ | 0.04 | –0.02 | 0.05 | |
| 3. Necessary Conditiona | 3.58 (1.04) | 0.16 | 0.07 | –0.20∗ | –0.31∗∗ | 0.40∗∗∗ | ||
| 4. Pain intensity (MPI) | 11.78 (2.73) | 0.38∗∗ | –0.32∗∗ | –0.28∗ | 0.35∗∗ | |||
| 5. Solving pain (PaSol)a | 16.53 (5.62) | –0.08 | –0.31 | 0.34∗∗ | ||||
| 6. Meaningfulness (PaSol)b | 20.88 (5.60) | 0.55∗∗ | –0.35∗∗ | |||||
| 7. Acceptance (PaSol)a | 8.78 (4.56) | –0.39∗∗ | ||||||
| 8. Catastrophizing (PCS)a | 23.25 (10.06) |
aPearson correlations; bKendall’s tau correlations; PaSol, Pain Solutions Questionnaire; PCS, Pain Catastrophizing Scale. +p = 0.05. ∗p < 0.05. ∗∗p < 0.01. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.