Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 25;31(2):258–274. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.2.258

Table 2. Summary of Clinical Trials in Which the Cardiovascular Effects of GLP-1 RAs Were Non-Primary Outcomes.

Study Duration, wk No. of patients Background+Comparator Intervention ΔBW, kg ΔHR, bpm ΔSystolicBP, mm Hg ΔCVD risk markers, mmol/L (for lipid profiles)
Exenatide BID
 Blevins et al. (2011) [51] (DURATION-5) 24 252 (None, 1 or combination of Met, SU, TZD)+exenatide QW Exenatide 10 µg BID –1.4 2.1a (4.1a for exenatide QW) –1.2 0.07 LDL-C
0.03 HDL-C
0.01 TG
 Bunck et al. (2010) [48] 52 69 Met+insulin glargine –3.9a b b –61% hs-CRPa
 Buse et al. (2009) [54] (LEAD-6) 26 464 (Met±SU)+liraglutide –2.9 0.69a (+3.28a for liraglutide) –2.0 –0.40 LDL-C
–0.05 HDL-C
–0.23 TGc
–0.10 FFAc
–0.03 g/L ApoB
 Davies et al. (2009) [55] 26 235 2 or 3 OADs+insulin glargine –2.73a b –2.9 –0.25 LDL-Ca
0.01 HDL-C
–0.33 TG
 DeFronzo et al. (2010) [56] 20 137 Met+TZD –2.8a b b –0.05 LDL-Ca
0.02 HDL-C
–0.34 TGa
 Derosa et al. (2010) [49] 52 128 Met+SU –8.0a b b ↓hs-CRP (VNR)a
 Drucker et al. (2008) [57] (DURATION-1) 30 295 (Met, SU, TZD or any two combined)+exenatide QW –3.6 b –3.4 +0.03 LDL-Cc
–0.03 HDL-C
–11% TG
 Klonoff et al. (2008) [58] 3 years 217 (Met±SU)+placebo –5.3a b –3.5a –6% LDL-Ca
24% HDL-Ca
–12% TG-Ca
 Moretto et al. (2008) [59] 24 232 None+placebo –3.1a b –3.7a –0.07 LDL-C
0.02 HDL-C
Exenatide QW
 Drucker et al. (2008) [57] (DURATION-1) 30 295 (Met, SU, TZD, or any two combined)+exenatide BID Exenatide QW –3.7 b –4.7 –0.13 LDL-Ca
–0.02 HDL-C
–15% TG
 Buse et al. (2010) [60] (DURATION-1 extension) +22 (52 in total) 295 (Met, SU, TZD, or any two combined)+exenatide BID or QW from DURATION-1 studies –4.1 (QW)–4.5 (BID→QW) b –6.2a (QW)–3.8 (BID→QW) –9.6 mg/dL TC
–0.7 mg/dL HDL-C
–3.4 mg/dL LDL-C
–15% TG
 MacConell et al. (2013) [61] (DURATION-1 extension) 3 years 295 (Met, SU, TZD, or any two combined)+exenatide BID→exenatide QW –2.3a b –2.1 –0.26 TC
–0.18 LDL-C
0.03 HDL-C
–12% TG
 Bergenstal et al. (2010) [50] (DURATION-2) 26 491 Met+(Sit or TZD) –2.3a b ↓(VNR)a ↑HDL-Ca
–5% TG
↓hs-CRPa
↓BNPa
 Diamant et al. (2010) [53] (DURATION-3) 26 456 (Met±SU)+insulin glargine –2.6a 4.0a –3.0a –0.05 LDL-C
0.0 HDL-C
–2.0 mg/dL hs-CRPa
 Diamant et al. (2012) [52] (DURATION-3 extension) 84 456 (Met±SU)+insulin glargine –2.1a 1.97a –4.2a –0.12 TC
0.95 TG
–2.05 mg/dL hs-CRP
 Diamant et al. (2014) [62] (DURATION-3 extension) 3 years 456 (Met±SU)+insulin glargine –2.49a 2 –2 –0.13 TCa
–0.17 LDL-Ca
0.05 HDL-Ca
1.02 TG
–2.00 mg/dL CRPa
 Russell-Jones et al. (2012) [63] (DURATION-4) 26 820 None+(Met, TZD or Sit) –2.0 1.5 –1.3 No change in fasting serum lipids (VNR)
 Blevins et al. (2011) [51] (DURATION-5) 24 252 (None, 1, or combination: Met, SU, TZD)+exenatide BID –2.3a 4.1a (2.1a for exenatide BID) –2.9a –0.17 LDL-Ca
0.0 HDL-C
0.01 TG
 Buse et al. (2013) [64] (DURATION-6) 26 911 (Met, SU, Met+SU, or Met+TZD)+liraglutide –2.68 b –2.48 (–3.45 for liraglutide) –0.06 TC
0.02 HDL-C
–0.05 LDL-C
–2.19 nmol/L hs-CRP
–4.45 ng/L BNP
Liraglutide
 Marre et al. (2009) [65] (LEAD-1) 26 1,041 SU+(TZD or TZD placebo) 1.2 mg/day +0.3a 2–4a –2.6–2.8 b
1.8 mg/day –0.2a 2–4a –2.6–2.8 b
 Nauck et al. (2009) [66] (LEAD-2) 26 1,091 Met+(SU or placebo) 1.2 mg/day –2.6a 2–3a –2–3a b
1.8 mg/day –2.8a 2–3a –2–3a b
 Garber et al. (2009) [67] (LEAD-3) 52 746 None+SU 1.2 mg/day –2.1a 3.2a –2.1 b
1.8 mg/day –2.5a 1.6 –3.6a b
 Garber et al. (2011) [68] (LEAD-3 extension) 2 years 746 None+SU 1.2 mg/day –1.89a 2.04 –1.35 b
1.8 mg/day –2.70a 0.92 –2.37 b
 Zinman et al. (2009) [69] (LEAD-4) 26 533 (Met+TZD)+placebo 1.2 mg/day –1.0a b –6.7a –0.21 TC
–0.28 LDL-Ca
–0.03 HDL-C
–0.38 TGa
–0.03 FFAa
1.8 mg/day –2.0a b –5.6a –0.20 TC
–0.23 LDL-C
–0.04 HDL-C
–0.32 TG
–0.05 FFAa
 Russell-Jones et al. (2009) [70] (LEAD-5) 26 581 (Met+SU)+(insulin glargine or placebo) 1.8 mg/day –1.8a b –4.0a b
 Buse et al. (2009) [54] (LEAD-6) 26 464 (Met±SU)+exenatide 1.8 mg/day –3.2 3.28 (0.69 for exenatide BID) –2.5 –0.44 LDL-C
–0.04 HDL-C
–0.41 TGa
–0.17 FFAa
–0.06 g/L ApoB
 Buse et al. (2010) [71] (LEAD-6 extension) +14 (40 in total) 376 (Met±SU)+exenatideBID→liraglutide 1.8 mg/day –0.9a b –3.8a b
 Pratley et al. (2010) [72] 26 658 Met+Sit 1.2 mg/day –2.86a 2.32 –0.55 –0.08 LDL-C
0.00 HDL-C
–0.19 TG
–0.03 FFA
–0.06 g/L ApoB
1.8 mg/day –3.38a 3.94 –0.72 –0.05 LDL-C
0.00 HDL-C
–0.43 TG
–0.07 FFA
–0.07 g/L ApoB
 Pratley et al. (2011) [73] extension +26 (52 in total) 436 Met+Sit 1.2 mg/day –2.78a 1.72 –0.37 0.09 LDL-C
–0.10 TG
–0.07 FFA
–0.03 g/L ApoB
1.8 mg/day –3.68a 3.09 –2.55 0.09 LDL-C
–0.32 TG
–0.10 FFA
–0.03 g/L ApoB
Lixisenatide
 Rosenstock et al. (2013) [74] (GetGoal-X) 24 634 Met+exenatide BID 20 µg QD –2.8 0.1 –2.9 b
 Rosenstock et al. (2014) [75] (GetGoal-S) 24 859 (SU±Met)+placebo 20 µg QD –1.76a –0.1 Slight decrease (VNR) No relevant change in lipid levels (VNR)
Albiglutide
 Nauck et al. (2016) [76] (HARMONY 2) 52 309 None+placebo 30 mg QW –0.39 2.5 –2.8 –0.312 TC
–0.278 LDL-C
0.051 HDL-C
–0.379 TG
–0.038 FFA
50 mg QW –0.86 0.8 –1.3 –0.101 TC
–0.130 LDL-C
0.042 HDL-C
0.014 TG
–0.007 FFA
 Ahren et al. (2014) [77] (HARMONY 3) 104 1,049 Met+(Sit, SU or placebo) 30 mg QW –1.21a 1.3 –1.0 –0.07 TC
–0.03 LDL-C
0.04 HDL-C
–0.20 TG
 Weissman et al. (2014) [78] (HARMONY 4) 52 779 (Met±SU)+insulin glargine 30 mg QW –1.06 1.0 –1.4 –2.1 mg/dL TC
–1.8 mg/dL LDL-C
2.1 mg/dL HDL-C
–17.3 mg/dL TG
 Pratley et al. (2014) [79] (HARMONY 7) 32 841 (Met, TZD, SU, or any combination)+liraglutide 1.8 mg QD 30 mg→ 50 mg QW at week 6 –0.64 5.7 at week 4 (max) <±1.0 Investigator-assessed cardiovascular AE: 8.2% (forliraglutide: 10.5%)
Returned to baseline within study period
Dulaglutide
 Wysham et al. (2014) [80] (AWARD-1) 52 976 (Met±TZD)+(exenatide BID or placebo→dulaglutide at week 26) 0.75 mg/day –0.20a 1.56 (2.80a at week 26) 1.62 (–0.36a at week 26) –0.09 TC
–0.08 LDL-C
0.00 HDL-C
0.04 TG
1.5 mg/day –1.30a 1.68 (2.80a at week 26) 0.83 (0.11a at week 26) –0.12 TC
–0.06 LDL-C
0.05 HDL-C
–0.26 TGa
 Giorgino et al. (2015) [81] (AWARD-2) 78 810 (Met±SU)+insulin glargine 0.75 mg/day –1.33a 0.61a –0.59 0.03 TC
–0.02 LDL-C
–0.02 HDL-C
0.03 TG
1.5 mg/day –1.87a 1.31a –0.70 0.02 TC
0.00 LDL-C
0.00 HDL-C
0.05 TG
 Umpierrez et al. (2014) [82] (AWARD-3) 52 807 None+(Met+placebo) 0.75 mg/day+oral placebo –1.36 at week 26 (VNR for week 52) 1.6 –2.7 –1% TCa
–2% LDL-Ca
2% HDL-C
–1% TG
1.5 mg/day+oral placebo –2.29 at week 26 (VNR for week 52) 1.8 –0.1 –2% TC
–2% LDL-Ca
5% HDL-C
–4% TG
 Blonde et al. (2015 )[83] (AWARD-4) 52 884 Insulin±OADs→(insulin lispro+Met)+insulin glargine 0.75 mg/day +0.18 at week 26 (VNR for week 52) 2.27 1.04 0.94% TC
–1.02% LDL-C
3.54% HDL-Ca
5.73% TG
1.5 mg/day –0.87 at week 26 (VNR for week 52) 2.38a –0.26 0.00% TC
–1.95% LDL-C
2.44% HDL-Ca
2.96% TG
 Nauck et al. (2014) [84] (AWARD-5) 52 1,098 (None, 1, or combination of OAD)+Sit or placebo (placebo→Sit at week 26) 0.75 mg/day –2.60a 2.1a –0.5 –0.03 TC
0.02 LDL-C
0.07 HDL-C
–0.15 TG
1.5 mg/day –3.03a 2.4a –0.8 –0.03 TC
–0.06 LDL-Ca
0.05 HDL-C
–0.16 TG
 Weinstock et al. (2015) [85] (AWARD-5 extension) 2 years 1,098 (None, 1, or combination of OAD)+Sit or placebo (placebo→Sit at week 26) 0.75 mg/day –2.39 2.8a 1.3 No significant changes in lipids (VNR)
1.5 mg/day –2.88a 2.3a –0.1
 Dungan et al. (2014) [86] (AWARD-6) 26 599 Met+liraglutide 1.5 mg/day –2.90 2.37 –3.36 b

GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; BW, body weight; HR, heart rate; BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BID, twice a day; DURATION, Diabetes therapy Utilization: Researching changes in A1c, weight and other factors Through Intervention with exenatide Once weekly; Met, metformin; SU, sulfonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinediones; QW, weekly; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LEAD, liraglutide effects and action in diabetes; FFA, free fatty acids; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; Sit, sitagliptin; VNR, value not reported; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; QD, daily; AE, adverse event; AWARD, Assessment of Weekly Administration of LY2189265 in Diabetes-1.

aStatistically significant from comparator; bNot determined or not checked; cPerformed significantly more poorly than comparator.