Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 3;9(2):95–114. doi: 10.3233/DEV-14154

Table 4.

Analysis of Variance for RCCT Performance with Age, Gender and School Meal Type as Between Subject Variables

Source SS df MS F p η2
Between-Subjects Effects
Gender 582.73 1.000 582.73 2.040 0.157 0.023
Age 2701.44 2.000 1350.72 4.729 0.011 *  0.097
FSM 2287.70 1.000 2287.70 8.010 0.006 ** 0.083
Gender *Age 429.21 2.000 214.61 0.751 0.475 0.017
Gender * FSM 1595.04 1.000 1595.04 5.584 0.020 *  0.060
Age *FSM 134.65 2.000 67.33 0.236 0.790 0.005
Gender *Age *FSM 922.05 2.000 461.02 1.614 0.205 0.035
Within-Subject Effects
RCCT 121229.74 2.227 54441.98 330.56 0.000 *** 0.790
RCCT *Gender 436.56 2.227 196.05 1.190 0.309 0.013
RCCT *Age 624.37 4.454 140.20 0.851 0.504 0.019
RCCT *FSM 251.22 2.227 112.82 0.685 0.520 0.008
RCCT *Gender *Age 586.10 4.454 131.60 0.799 0.539 0.018
RCCT * Gender * FSM 2371.39 2.227 1064.95 6.466 0.001 *** 0.068
RCCT *Age *FSM 841.18 4.454 188.88 1.147 0.337 0.025
RCCT *Gender *Age *FSM 506.37 4.454 113.70 0.690 0.615 0.015

Note. Degrees of Freedom were corrected with Greenhouse-Geisser. RCCT = Rotated Cube Sections; FSM = school meal type; Age = Age groups.  *p <  0.05.  **p <  0.01.  ***p <  0.001. Statistical effects set in bold were significant.