Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 3;9(2):95–114. doi: 10.3233/DEV-14154

Table 7.

Analysis of Variance for RCCT vs. RCPM Performance with Age, Gender and Free School Meals

Source SS df MS F p η2
Between-Subjects Effects
Gender 148.30 1.000 148.30 0.745 0.390 0.008
Age 1874.83 2.000 937.41 4.710 0.011 *  0.097
FSM 3281.50 1.000 3281.51 16.489 0.000 ** 0.158
Gender *Age 644.28 2.000 322.14 1.619 0.204 0.035
Gender *FSM 397.31 1.000 397.31 1.996 0.161 0.022
Age *FSM 84.79 2.000 42.40 0.213 0.809 0.005
Gender *Age *FSM 666.78 2.000 333.39 1.675 0.193 0.037
Within-Subject Effects
Test 4240.60 1.000 4240.60 60.712 0.000 *** 0.408
Test *Gender 23.93 1.000 23.93 0.343 0.560 0.004
Test * Age 577.37 2.000 288.68 4.133 0.019 *  0.086
Test * FSM 550.54 1.000 550.54 7.882 0.006 ** 0.082
Test *Gender *Age 174.53 2.000 87.26 1.249 0.292 0.028
Test *Gender *FSM 69.02 1.000 69.02 0.988 0.323 0.011
Test *Age *FSM 120.61 2.000 60.30 0.863 0.425 0.019
Test *Gender *Age *FSM 106.54 2.000 53.27 0.763 0.469 0.017

Note. Degrees of Freedom were corrected with Greenhouse-Geisser. Test = Test type (RCCT vs. RCPM); FSM = school meal type; Age = Age groups.  *p <  0.05.  **p <  0.01.  ***p <  0.001. Statistical effects set in bold were significant.