Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 21;4:e2144. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2144

Table 3. OR values for the UTUC subgroups according to clinical characteristics.

Outcome of interest Studies Patients OR 95% CI P value Model Heterogeneity
I2, P value
Ta/1 vs. T2-4 9 2,462 3.12 1.85–5.27 0.000 Random 86%, 0.000
High grade vs. Low grade 3 799 1.66 1.20–2.29 0.002 Fixed 32%, 0.23
G3 vs. G1 + G2 2 921 1.42 0.75–2.69 0.28 Random 76%, 0.04
G2 + G3 vs. G1 2 921 0.94 0.49–1.79 0.85 Fixed 0%, 0.42
Lymph node metastasis vs. No lymph node metastasis 6 1,834 1.60 1.13–2.26 0.009 Fixed 0%, 0.55
Renal pelvis vs. Ureter 10 2,858 4.28 2.91–6.30 0.000 Random 78%, 0.000
Recurrence vs. No recurrence 2 737 1.28 0.92–1.77 0.14 Fixed 0%, 0.68
Gender (Male vs. Female) 7 2,556 1.01 0.86–1.19 0.90 Fixed 6%, 0.38

Notes.

Abbreviations

CI
confidence interval
Fixed
fixed, inverse variance model
I2
I-squared
OR
odds ratio
Random
random, I–V heterogeneity model