Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;18:68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0725-1

Table 2.

Impact of discordant estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status between cores on agreement between tissue microarrays and the clinical record in phase III of the Carolina Breast Cancer Study

Central TMA Agreement (%) Kappa (95 % CI)
Clinical ER status ER-negative, n (%) ER-positive, n (%)
All cases, n = 1085
 ER-negative, n (%) 259 (90) 42 (5) 94 0.84 (0.80–0.87)
 ER-positive, n (%) 28 (10) 756 (95)
Concordant, n = 985
 ER-negative, n (%) 217 (96) 32 (4) 96 0.89 (0.86–0.92)
 ER-positive, n (%) 8 (4) 728 (96)
Discordant, n = 100
 ER-negative, n (%) 42 (68) 10 (26) 70 0.39 (0.22–0.57)
 ER-positive, n (%) 20 (32) 28 (74)
Clinical PR status PR-negative, n (%) PR-positive, n (%)
All cases, n = 1085
 PR-negative, n (%) 305 (80) 41 (6) 89 0.76 (0.72–0.80)
 PR-positive, n (%) 75 (20) 664 (94)
Concordant, n = 916
 PR-negative, n (%) 246 (91) 27 (4) 95 0.87 (0.83–0.90)
 PR-positive, n (%) 23 (9) 620 (96)
Discordant, n = 169
 PR-negative, n (%) 59 (53) 14 (24) 61 0.25 (0.12–0.38)
 PR-positive, n (%) 52 (47) 44 (76)
Clinical HER2 status Negative Equivocal Positive
All cases, n = 1085
 Negative, n (%) 864 (93) 16 (80) 28 (21) 88 0.57 (0.51–0.63)
 Equivocal, n (%) 49 (5) 2 (10) 13 (10)
 Positive, n (%) 17 (2) 2 (10) 94 (70)
Concordant, n = 889
 Negative, n (%) 768 (99) 7 (88) 22 (21) 96 0.78 (0.72–0.84)
 Equivocal, n (%) 4 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1)
 Positive, n (%) 5 (1) 1 (12) 81 (78)
Discordant, n = 196
 Negative, n (%) 96 (63) 9 (75) 6 (19) 57 0.16 (0.07–0.28)
 Equivocal, n (%) 45 (29) 2 (17) 12 (39)
 Positive, n (%) 12 (8) 1 (8) 13 (42)

Abbreviations: ER estrogen receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, PR progesterone receptor, TMA tissue microarray

Concordant cases are those with the same biomarker status across all cores for a given case, while discordant cases are those with discordant biomarker status between any two cores for a given case