Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 27;7:30. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0095-7

Table 2.

Quantification of VEP components and comparison between groups

Control Deletion Duplication Group comparisons Pairwise comparisons
Good trials 63 (49) 60 (39) 45 (47) H(2): 0.22, p = 0.894
Latency measurements (ms)
    N1 latency 60 (15) 46 (30) 46 (16) H(2): 6.85, p= 0.033 Ctr/Del: p = 0.053
Ctr/Dup: p = 0.099
Del/Dup: p = 1.000
    P1 latency 94 (9) 92 (12) 90 (7) H(2): 1.72, p = 0.422
    N2 latency 164 (71) 164 (44) 152 (81) H(2): 0.13, p = 0.937
    P1-N2 time 72.0 (66.0) 72.0 (50.0) 72.0 (76.0) H(2): 0.37, p = 0.858
Amplitude measurements (uV)
    N1 amp −4.5 (5.1) −1.2 (5.4) −3.4 (4.3) H(2): 3.97, p = 0.137
    P1 amp 10.4 (8.1) 15.7 (11.2) 5.4 (9.5) H(2): 11.92, p= 0.003 Ctr/Del: p = 0.088
Ctr/Dup: p = 0.628
Del/Dup: p = 0.003
    N2 amp −0.94 (11.5) −7.45 (7.3) −3.19 (7.2) H(2): 1.55, p = 0.460
    N1-P1 amp 15.0 (17.5) 16.9 (6.1) 8.3 (11.1) H(2): 6.81, p= 0.033 Ctr/Del: p = 1.000
Ctr/Dup: p = 0.226
Del/Dup: p = 0.028
    P1-N2 amp 12.9 (17.6) 19.7 (16.4) 8.1 (10.3) H(2): 10.48, p= 0.005 Ctr/Del: p = 0.207
Ctr/Dup: p = 0.455
Del/Dup: p = 0.005

Median values (interquartile range) are reported. Amp: amplitude. Pairwise comparisons with adjusted p values were performed if the overall group comparison was significant (p < 0.05). Significant results are in bold