Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 21;5(6):1037–1046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.666

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with fertility and sexual health discussions, and fertility preservation

Fertility discussion Sexual health discussion Fertility preservation
Category Level OR 95% CI P‐Value Global P ‐Value OR 95% CI P ‐Value Global P‐Value OR 95% CI P‐Value Global P‐Value
Age+ <31 1 1 1
31–34 1.05 0.57–1.93 0.61 0.68 3.72 0.94–14.72 0.25 0.05 0.69 0.31–1.49 0.16 0.01
35–38 1.06 0.60–1.89 0.50 2.01 0.51–7.99 0.48 0.43 0.20–0.91 0.73
39+ 0.74 0.37–1.47 0.24 5.58 1.37–22.76 0.02 0.16 0.05–0.55 0.01
ECOG+ 0 1 1 1
1 or 2 1.27 0.70–2.33 0.43 1.03 0.33–3.24 0.96 1.83 0.65–5.17 0.25
Relationship status Single 1
Partner 1.59 0.97–2.60 0.06
Children at initial consultation Had children 1
No children 3.13 1.64–5.98 0.0005
Family History of cancer among 1st degree relatives+ No 1 1
Yes 1.37 0.87–2.16 0.17 1.82 0.84–3.98 0.13
Tumor group+ Breast 1 1 1
testicular 0.94 0.58–1.53 0.31 0.35 1.38 0.47–4.03 0.32 0.001 3.43 1.74–6.78 0.007 0.002
Gynecological 1.44 0.81–2.57 0.15 5.13 2.17–12.12 0.001 2.11 0.97–4.59 0.72
Treatment site Other 1
Teaching hospital 1.80 0.97–3.56 0.06
Sexual health discussion at initial consultation No 1
Yes 3.06 1.20–7.87 0.02
Fertility discussion at Initial consultation No 1
Yes 13.06 5.75–29.62 <0.0001

Note that a backwards selection procedure was used to refine the models so that covariates that did not significantly improve model fitness as per the likelihood ratio test were removed one at a time.

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Bold values represent statistically significant values on multivariate analysis.