Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 7;4(3):371–379. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604779

Table 3.

Cutoff points for the different outcome variables

AIMS65 GBS RS
Inpatient cmortality 1 (S: 100%; E: 24%; PPV: 12%; NPV: 100%) 12 (S: 76%; E: 68%; PPV: 19%; NPV: 96%) 6 (S: 90%; E: 60%; PPV: 19%; NPV: 98%)
Endoscopic intervention 1 (S: 87%; E: 28%; PPV: 45%; NPV: 76%) 9 (S: 75%; E: 44%; PPV: 48%; NPV: 72%)
Rebleeding 11 (S: 77%; E: 54%; PPV: 7%; NPV: 98%) 6 (S: 69%; E: 56%; PPV: 7%; NPV: 98%)
Surgery
Transfusion 1 (S: 88%; E: 37%; PPV: 69%; NPV: 64%) 8 (S: 91%; E: 58%, PPV: 78%, NPV: 80%) 4 (S: 87%; E: 51%; PPV: 75%; NPV: 71%)
Delayed mortality (6 mo) 2 (S: 38%; E: 89%; PPV: 31%; NPV: 91%) 10 (S: 72%; E: 49%; PPV: 16%; NPV: 93%) 6 (S: 69%; E: 64%; PPV: 20%; NPV: 94%)
Composite endpoint 1 (S: 88%; E: 29%; PPV: 49%; NPV: 76%) 10 (S: 65%; E: 51%; PPV: 51%, NPV: 65%) 5 (S: 82%; E: 57%; PPV: 60%; NPV: 81%)

GBS: Glasgow–Blatchford Score; RS: Rockall score; S: sensitivity; E: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value