Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 24;68(7):1603–1613. doi: 10.1002/art.39619

Table 4.

Comparison of MAFs of SNPs in the arcOGEN and WTCCC2 cohortsa

Chr. SNP MAF in arcOGEN cases (n = 5,283) MAF in WTCCC2 controls (n = 4,766) OR (95% CI)
1 rs10489912 0.42 0.42 1.01 (0.96–1.07)
1 rs2249707 0.31 0.31 1.00 (0.94–1.06)
2 rs888427 0.36 0.36 1.02 (0.96–1.08)
2 rs10181656 0.23 0.22 1.04 (0.98–1.11)
4 rs6533712 0.48 0.47 1.04 (0.99–1.10)
5 rs71624119 0.24 0.24 1.02 (0.95–1.09)
5 rs528092 0.33 0.33 1.00 (0.95–1.06)
6 rs10440835 0.34 0.33 1.03 (0.97–1.09)
8 rs4840565 0.28 0.27 1.02 (0.96–1.08)
8b rs4736558 0.24 0.23 1.09 (1.02–1.16)
11 rs613587 0.30 0.29 1.04 (0.97–1.10)
16 rs28698667 0.41 0.42 0.98 (0.93–1.04)
17 rs2689 0.49 0.48 1.02 (0.96–1.08)
18 rs16955629 0.24 0.24 1.02 (0.96–1.09)
21 rs9979383 0.38 0.37 1.01 (0.95–1.07)
a

WTCCC2 = Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2; Chr. = chromosome; OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

b

The single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4736558 on chromosome 8 was the only SNP that showed any difference in minor allele frequency (MAF) (uncorrected P value = 0.010) and was excluded from the analysis.