Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Syst Appl. 2016 Feb 18;55:361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.02.011

Table 5.

The fragment selection performance of CPTAgg and BNPTL. The numbers 25% and 50% indicate different portions of irrelevant fragments in the sources. Note that chance here is much lower than 75/50% due to unknown network correspondence.


25% random CPTs

Name
Fragment Accuracy
KLD
CPTAgg BNPTL STL CPTAgg BNPTL



Weather 61.0%* 90.0% 0.03±0.02* 0.01±0.00 0.01±0.00
Cancer 94.8% 96.0% 0.33±0.31 0.14±0.09 0.07±0.05
Asia 78.0%* 97.5% 0.85±0.18* 0.67±0.14* 0.18±0.00
Insurance 82.4% 70.7%* 1.82±0.16* 1.01±0.04* 0.74±0.02
Alarm 61.7% 58.8%* 2.43±0.15* 1.60±0.27* 0.57±0.02
Hailfinder 75.5% 62.4%* 2.85±0.03* 2.04±0.03* 0.79±0.02


Average 75.6% 79.2% 1.38±0.14 0.91±0.10 0.39±0.02


50% random CPTs


Weather 57.0%* 74.5% 0.03±0.02* 0.01±0.00 0.01±0.00
Cancer 79.2% 82.4% 0.33±0.31 0.13±0.07 0.08±0.04
Asia 61.5%* 80.8% 0.85±0.18* 0.42±0.19 0.20±0.01
Insurance 65.9% 51.9%* 1.82±0.16* 0.97±0.05 0.90±0.04
Alarm 51.0% 46.4%* 2.43±0.15* 1.38±0.17* 0.63±0.04
Hailfinder 65.7% 49.9%* 2.85±0.03* 2.07±0.03* 0.43±0.02


Average 63.4% 64.3% 1.38±0.14 0.83±0.09 0.38±0.03