Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0158284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158284

Table 2. Results of analysis of molecular variance for Ephedra przewalskii based on chloroplast DNA sequence data.

Source of variation d.f. Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation (%)
Among populations 44 318.227 0.6835 86.21*
Within populations 424 46.374 0.1094 13.79
(1–12, 25, 30–31) vs. (13–16) vs. (17–18) vs. (19–20) vs. (21) vs. (22–24, 27–29) vs. (26) vs. (32) vs. (33–35) vs. (36–44) vs. (45)
Among groups 10 313.467 0.8228 87.99*
Among populations within groups 34 4.760 0.0029 0.31*
Within populations 424 46.374 0.1094 11.70*
Geographic regions
Among geographic regions 7 170.552 0.4103 46.05*
Among populations within regions 37 147.675 0.3713 41.68*
Within populations 424 46.374 0.1094 12.17*

* P < 0.001