Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 29;107(5):438–444. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw027

Table 1.

QTL for abdominal scale patterns in Aedes aegypti

Phenotype Chrom Position LOD (P) BCI (95%) Closest marker Flanking markers EV a d Action Degree
A 1 35.0 2.97 (0.019) (24; 46) Ace Ace-ARC2 6.9 0.56 −0.29 PD 0.52
2 62.0 12.29 (0.0001) (57; 63) NicPhRT LF203-NicPhRT 25.5 1.49 1.4 D 0.94
3 58.8 3.37 (0.006) (29; 68) AC4 AEDC1-AC4 7.8 0.65 0.4 PD 0.62
B 1 33.0 2.16 (0.126) (5; 48) Ace B8L720-Ace na na na na na
2 63.0 26.43 (0.0001) (62; 66) NicPhRT NicPhRT-AEG12 46.9 3.13 1.6 PD 0.51
3 58.8 5.96 (0.0001) (52; 63) AC4 AEDC1-AC4 13.3 1.39 0.93 PD 0.67
C 1 33.0 2.69 (0.046) (22; 48) Ace B8L720-Ace 6.2 0.83 0.65 PD 0.78
2 64.0 26.09 (0.0001) (62; 66) AEGI2 NicPhRT-AEG12 46.5 2.86 −0.02 A 0.01
3 57.0 5.28 (0.0001) (48; 63) AC4 AEDC1-AC4 11.9 1.39 0.76 PD 0.55

BCI, Bayes confidence interval; EV, estimated phenotypic variance explained; a, additive effect; d, dominance effect; Action, mode of action determined as d/a where additive = 0.0–0.20, partial dominance = 0.21–0.80, dominance = 0.81–1.20, and overdominance = >1.20 (after Stuber et al. 1987; Babu et al. 2006); Degree, d/a.