Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan 18;223(1):99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.057

Table 1. Clinicopathologic Factors of 109 Patients for Whom 2-Stage Hepatectomy Was Planned.

Characteristic Only first-stage resection completed (n=20) Second-stage resection completed (n=89) p Value
Median age, y (range) 51 (26-68) 52 (23-72) 0.416
Sex, n (%) 0.680
 Male 14 (70) 58 (65)
 Female 6 (30) 6 (30)
Primary tumor location, n (%) 0.642
 Colon 16 (80) 75 (84)
 Rectum 4 (20) 14 (16)
Primary tumor nodal status, n (%) 0.650
 Positive 14 (70) 58 (65)
 Negative 2 (10) 12 (14)
 Unknown 4 (20) 19 (21)
Synchronous presentation of CLM, n (%) 19 (95) 74 (83) 0.176
Combined primary resection at first-stage*, n (%) 4 (20) 21 (24) 0.730
Extrahepatic metastases at time of first-stage resection, n (%) 0 16 (18) 0.040
No. of CLM on preoperative imaging, median (range) 9 (4-60) 6 (2-25) 0.004
Median diameter of largest metastasis on preoperative imaging, mm (range) 45 (18-120) 29 (10-144) 0.011
Median no. of cycles of chemotherapy before first-stage resection (range) 10 (3-26) 6 (1-24) 0.006
Interval chemotherapy administered after first-stage resection, n (%) 19 (95) 39 (44) <0.001
Positive margin on first- or second-stage resection, n (%) 2 (10) 22 (25) 0.150
Portal vein embolization, n (%) 18 (90) 62 (70) 0.063
RAS mutation, n (%) 8 (40) 32 (36) 0.378
Pathological response on final resection (first- or second-stage), n (%)
 Complete NA 5 (5.5) NA
 Major 22 (24.5)
 Minor 37 (42)
 Unknown 25 (28)
*

In addition, only one patients underwent a combined primary resection at time of second stage.

Sixteen patients (15%) did not undergo evaluation of RAS mutation status, and no patient had NRAS mutations.

CLM, colorectal liver metastases.