Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Mod Pathol. 2016 Apr 8;29(7):717–726. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.62

Table 2.

Participants Reactions to Test Set Difficulty and Continuing Medical Education in General According to Perceived Agreement with Reference Diagnosis (Performance Gap) - All Diagnostic Groups Combined (Benign, Atypia, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive) (n=92)

Participant Characteristics Performance Gap * p-value
Total n (col %) Under Estimated Performance n (row %) Closely Estimated Performance n (row %) Over Estimated Performance n (row %)
Perceptions of Test Set Difficulty (pre-program only unless otherwise noted)
 Within the entire spectrum of breast pathology you see in your practice, how similar were the types of cases included in the sample sets?
  I never see cases like these 0 (0.0) 0 (.) 0 (.) 0 (.) 0.047
  I sometimes see cases like these 21 (23.6) 4 (19.0) 14 (66.7) 3 (14.3)
  I often see cases like these 46 (51.7) 5 (10.9) 38 (82.6) 3 (6.5)
  I always see cases like these 22 (24.7) 4 (18.2) 11 (50.0) 7 (31.8)
 Relative to breast cases you review in practice over the course of a year, did you find these sample sets:
  Less Challenging 2 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0.38
  Equally Challenging 60 (67.4) 9 (15.0) 43 (71.7) 8 (13.3)
  More Challenging 27 (30.3) 4 (14.8) 18 (66.7) 5 (18.5)
Continuing Medical Education Experiences
 How many hours of continuing medical education in breast pathology interpretation (not including this program) did you complete last year:
  None 16 (17.6) 3 (18.8) 10 (62.5) 3 (18.8) 0.20
  1 – 5 hours 35 (38.5) 6 (17.1) 24 (68.6) 5 (14.3)
  6 – 8 hours 14 (15.4) 1 (7.1) 13 (92.9) 0 (0.0)
  9 – 12 hours 6 (6.6) 2 (33.3) 2 (33.3) 2 (33.3)
  13 – 18 hours 6 (6.6) 1 (16.7) 4 (66.7) 1 (16.7)
  >18 hours 14 (15.4) 1 (7.1) 10 (71.4) 3 (21.4)
 Which of the following types of continuing medical education do you most prefer:
  Instructor-led Programs 60 (65.9) 8 (13.3) 44 (73.3) 8 (13.3) 0.55
  Self-Directed Programs 24 (26.4) 6 (25.0) 15 (62.5) 3 (12.5)
  Other 7 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 4 (57.1) 3 (42.9)
Alignment of Perceptions
 If you and the continuing medical education breast pathology experts disagree on some cases, do you think it would be more likely that you would:
  Over interpret the case 25 (27.5) 5 (20.0) 19 (76.0) 1 (4.0) 0.72
  Under interpret the case 16 (17.6) 3 (18.8) 12 (75.0) 1 (6.3)
  Unsure/Don’t Know 50 (54.9) 6 (12.0) 32 (64.0) 12 (24.0)
 When you and the breast pathology experts disagreed on a case the experts called atypia was it more likely that you: (post-program only)
  Over interpreted the case (call it more serious than experts) 32 (34.8) 4 (12.5) 23 (71.9) 5 (15.6) 0.91
  Under interpret the case (call it less serious than experts) 41 (44.6) 6 (14.6) 28 (68.3) 7 (17.1)
  No trend for either over or under interpretation 19 (20.7) 4 (21.1) 13 (68.4) 2 (10.5)
 Did you learn new information and strategies that you can apply to your work or practice? (post-program only)
  No 18 (20.2) 5 (27.8) 12 (66.7) 1 (5.6) 0.75
  Yes 71 (79.8) 8 (11.3) 50 (70.4) 13 (18.3)

note: low cutoff point is mean − 1 standard deviation (12.0) is −7.0 and high cutoff point is mean + 1 standard deviation is 18.0 where mean is 6.0 and standard deviation is 12.0

*

Performance Gap is the difference between actual agreement and the weighted average perceived agreement for four diagnostic classes (mapping 1) of breast cancer

p-value for cumulative logit model adjusted for actual agreement