Table 2.
BCa 95% CI |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Point Estimate (a path*b path) | SE | Lower | Upper | |
Indirect Effects | ||||
Coping Motives | .0063 | .0021 | .0029 | .0113 |
Conformity Motives | .0028 | .0017 | <.0001 | .0069 |
Social Motives | <.0001 | .0007 | −.0015 | .0017 |
Enhancement Motives | <.0001 | .0005 | −.0014 | .0008 |
TOTAL | .0091 | .0027 | .0044 | .0151 |
Contrast Effects | ||||
Coping vs. Conformity | ..0035 | .0027 | −.0093 | .0016 |
Coping vs. Social | .0062 | .0022 | .0118 | .0027 |
Coping vs. Enhancement | .0063 | .0020 | .0030 | .0112 |
Conformity vs. Social | .0027 | .0021 | −.008 | .0075 |
Conformity vs. Enhancement | .0028 | .0018 | −.0001 | .0070 |
Note: Bold font = significant (CIs do not cross zero); BCa = bias corrected and accelerated.