Table 4.
Summary of studies in which development of OA was studied on the contralateral hip after arthroplasty
| Study | Journal | Year | Number | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ritter et al. [18] | J Arthroplasty | 1996 | 1116 patients (664 with normal hips) | Contralateral OA 79% at 10 years with 54% with THA; in normal hips 37% OA and 8% with THA |
| Goker et al. [10] | Arthritis Rheum | 2000 | 99 patients | Eighty-five percent of patients maintained a slow decline in joint space width (< 0.2 mm/year), and 15% had an accelerated decline in joint space width (> 0.2 mm/year); 21% underwent contralateral THA |
| Vossinakis et al. [20] | Skeletal Radiol | 2008 | 95 patients (56 with idiopathic OA) | Idiopathic OA of one hip increases risk of contralateral OA; prediction difficult only from radiographic measurements; weightbearing surface best predictor |
| Şahin et al. [19] | J Int Med Res | 2011 | 44 subjects with idiopathic OA and 40 control subjects | No difference in center-edge angle but femoroacetabular impingement features more prevalent in contralateral hip of patients with idiopathic OA |
| Current study | CORR ® | 2016 | 367 patients | Forty-one percent of patients progress to Charnley Class B disease, of which 19% undergo hip arthroplasty within 10 years; joint space width, center-edge angle, head-to-neck ratio, and osteophytes predicted development of OA; center-edge angle less than 25° counteracts the effect of a low head-to-neck ratio |
OA = osteoarthritis.