Table 2.
Grade quality of evidence of fire-needle moxibustion treatment for KOA.
| Outcome | Effect | Number of participants (studies) |
Quality of the evidence (GRADE) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative effect (95% CI) | Absolute effect (95% CI) | |||
| Recovery rate | RR 1.56 (1.34 to 1.81) |
162 more per 1000 (from 98 more to 234 more) |
1114 (12 studies) |
⊕⊕⊖ ⊖
Low1,2 |
|
| ||||
| Recovery and marked-improvement rate | RR 1.50 (1.36 to 1.64) |
250 more per 1000 (from 180 more to 319 more) |
1051 (11 studies) |
⊕⊕⊖
⊖
Low1,2 |
|
| ||||
| Pain | SMD 0.72 SD lower (1.23 lower to 0.22 lower) |
390 (6 studies) |
⊕⊖⊖
⊖
Very low1,2,3 |
|
1None of the trials were blinded; most of them did not mention randomization process and allocation concealment.
2Published evidence is limited due to a small number of trials, all of which are showing benefits.
3Confidence intervals with minimal overlap; the heterogeneity is significant.