Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;2016:3575468. doi: 10.1155/2016/3575468

Table 2.

Subsets of inflammatory cells in skin samples from controls and trombiculid and sarcoptic mange-infected chamois.

Examined subjects Classification of sarcoptic mange skin lesions CD3+ lymphocytes/10,000 μm2 CD79α + lymphocytes/10,000 μm2 CD68+ macrophages/10,000 μm2 Eosinophils/10,000 μm2 Mast cells/10,000 μm2
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Controls  5.4 ± 4.8  1.3 ± 1.9  5.0 ± 4.0  0.9 ± 1.7  0.1 ± 0.3
Trombiculosis  10.6 ± 7.1  2.9 ± 3.0  13.0 ± 11.7+  5.5 ± 3.8#  0.3 ± 0.4
Sarcoptic mange Grade 1  14.1 ± 7.5  2.3 ± 2.3  16.5 ± 10.0  4.0 ± 2.4  0.9 ± 0.7
Grade 2  15.2 ± 7.6  2.4 ± 2.4  15.2 ± 10.1  7.8 ± 6.8†††  1.0 ± 0.6
Grade 3  16.7 ± 10.3  3.3 ± 3.0∗∗∗  16.9 ± 9.2  6.2 ± 3.8‡‡‡  1.0 ± 0.6
Total  15.7 ± 8.9  2.9 ± 2.8  16.2 ± 9.7+††  6.5 ± 5.2#  1.0 ± 0.7∗∗‡‡

Significant differences among CD3+ T lymphocyte (), CD79α + B lymphocyte (†), CD68+ macrophages (+), eosinophils (#) and mast cells (∗∗) with controls. Significant differences between CD3+ T lymphocyte (‡), CD68+ macrophages (††) and mast cells (‡‡) in chamois with sarcoptic mange and subjects with trombiculosis. Significant differences among CD79α + B lymphocyte (∗∗∗) in chamois with grade 3 and subjects with grade 1 and 2; significant differences among eosinophils (†††) in chamois with grade 2 and animals with grade 1 and 3; significant differences between eosinophils (‡‡‡) in chamois with grade 3 and grade 1.