Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 29;6:28919. doi: 10.1038/srep28919

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Sample size Lauren differentiation (diffuse, %) WHO differentiation (G3, %) T1-2 (%) N0 (%) Location (U, %) MSI EBV (+) (ISH) ARID1A (−) (%) OS HR-E HR (95% CI)
Abe 2012 Japan 250 53.3% NA NA NA 27.9% 14.4% (I) 3.2% 11.0% SC 2.35 (1.39, 3.98)
Wang 2012 China 224 NA 78.6% 26.4% 40.2% NA NA NA 51.3% HR 1.64 (1.05, 2.54)
Wu 2012 China 166 NA 65.7% 31.3% 18.7% NA NA NA 24.1% RR 1.91 (1.27, 2.87)
Yan 2014 China 176 NA 51.7% 30.1% 33.0% NA NA NA 25.0% HR 1.98 (1.10, 3.57)
Li 2014 China 90 NA 61.1% 15.6% 24.4% 50.0% NA NA 70.0% SC 2.13 (0.89, 5.08)
Wiegand (Toronto) 2014 Canada 80 25.0% 57.5% 22.5% 40.0% NA 21.3% (I) 2.5% 20.0% HR 6.54 (2.09, 22.38)
Wiegand (Vancouver) 2014 Canada 173 21.4% 51.5% 10.4% 24.0% NA 14.5% (I) 3.5% 22.5% HR 1.04 (0.61, 1.71)
Dou 2015 China 103 37.9% 37.9% 42.7% 54.4% NA NA NA 65.0% RR 1.59 (1.06, 2.33 )
Han 2015 Korea 417 40.5% 36.9% 26.9% NA NA 8.2% (P) 7.3% 21.1% SC 1.49 (0.93, 2.39)
Ibarrola- Villava 2015 Spain 66 36.4% 30.3% NA NA 30.3% 15.2% (P) NA 27.0% SC 0.69 (0.31, 1.55)
Inada 2015 Japan 489 NA 60.5% NA 24.1% NA 7.8% (I) NA 39.6% HR 1.36 (1.01, 1.84)
Kim 2015 Korea 191 37.7% 64.4% 50.3% 45.5% 13.1% 19.9% (I) NA 32.5% SC 1.41 (0.74, 2.68)
Lee 2015 Korea 275 46.9% NA 56.7% 47.3% 15.3% 6.4% (P) NA 8.0% SC 2.70 (0.50, 14.50)
Kim 2016 Korea 350 32.3% 58.8% 33.7% 31.1% 20.0% 18.9% (I) 10% 18.6% HR 1.66 (1.13, 2.46)
Zhao 2016 China 133 62.4% 70.7% 12.0% 18.8% NA NA NA 42.1% HR 1.69 (1.06, 2.67)

NA: Not available; U: Upper third part of stomach; MSI: Microsatellite instability; I: Immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins; P: Polymerase chain reaction and electrophoresis of DNA; EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; ISH: In situ hybridization; OS: Overall Survival; HR-E: HR Estimated; SC: Survival curve; HR: Hazard ratio; RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.