Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jan 3;50(7):1135–1144. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-1002-1

Table 5.

Prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and association between immigrant generational status and IPV among respondents without child maltreatment

Immigrant generational Status (IGS) Prevalence of IPV, n (%) AOR1 (95 % CI)a AOR2 (95 % CI)b Gender × IGS interaction AOR (95 % CI)b Acculturation × IGS interaction AOR (95 % CI)b
IPV perpetration
 3rd Gen. 480 (3.9) 1.00 1.00 1.45 (0.94–2.23) 0.95 (0.92–0.99)*
 2nd Gen. 88 (3.9) 1.00 (0.73–1.38) 1.17 (0.77–1.78)
 1st Gen. 79 (3.0) 0.61 (0.40–0.93)* 0.69 (0.42–1.13)
IPV Victimization
 3rd Gen. 444 (3.8) 1.00 1.00 0.95 (0.66–1.38) 1.01 (0.98–1.03)
 2nd Gen. 79 (3.3) 0.88 (0.65–1.20) 0.90 (0.59–1.35)
 1st Gen. 78 (3.8) 0.83 (0.56–1.23) 1.34 (0.86–2.10)
a

Adjusted for age, gender, race, education, household income, marital status

b

Adjusted for age, gender, race, education, income, marital status, racial discrimination, mutual IPV, any past-year mood or anxiety disorder, and any past-year substance use disorder

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001