Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 10;8(1):913. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.913

TABLE 2.

Socio-demographic profile of the total sample and by treatment choice groups.

Profile Total sample (n = 193) FBTG intervention (n = 96) Usual care (n = 97) p-value


n Value n Value
Age in years, mean (s.d.) 50.4 (12.9) 96 50.3 (13.2) 97 50.4 (12.8) 0.940
Gender (column %)
Women 77.7 76 79.2 74 76.3 0.631
Men 22.3 20 20.8 23 23.7 -
Race (column %)
Coloured 49.2 52 54.2 43 44.3 0.072
Black 24.9 17 17.7 31 31.0 -
White or Asian 25.9 27 28.1 23 23.7 -
Currently employed (%)§ 54.4 48 50.0 57 58.8 0.222
Formal education, mean (s.d.) (years) 10.1 (2.7) 95 10.5 (2.8) 96 9.7 (2.6) 0.050
Family income per month,†† (column %) (%) (%) (%)
H0: (R0.00 or government pension) 19.1 17 17.7 20 20.6 0.671
H1: (R0.00 – R4166.66) 61.1 60 62.5 58 59.8 -
H2: (R4166.67 – R8333.33) 12.4 14 14.6 10 10.3 -
H3: (>R8333.34) 4.7 4 4.2 5 5.2 -
Private (medical aid) 2.6 1 1.0 4 4.1 -

s.d., standard deviation.

n varies owing to missing values.

Independent t-test (normally distributed data).

Chi-squared test.

§

% ‘Yes’ reported, balance recorded as ‘No’.

Wilcoxon rank-sum test (non-normally distributed data).

††

H0, H1, H2, H3, government classification for monthly income at time of assessment.