Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 15;146(7):1283–1289. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231639

TABLE 4.

FA analysis of RPMI B cells1

FAs BSA EPA DHA
14:0 0.9 ± 0.6 0.5 ± 0.5 0.6 ± 0.3
16:0 23.2 ± 1.4 16.0 ± 2.8 20.3 ± 1.3
16:1 4.0 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.8 3.1 ± 0.2
18:0 19.4 ± 0.4 15.9 ± 0.4** 17.1 ± 0.4*
cis 18:1 24.6 ± 3.4 17.5 ± 0.2 19.4 ± 0.2
18:2(n–6) 1.8 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.1
20:4(n–6) 16.9 ± 3.9 7.2 ± 0.8* 9.0 ± 0.3*
20:5(n–3) 0.4 ± 0.1 9.4 ± 0.3*** 0.6 ± 0.1
22:5(n–3) 4.7 ± 0.6 26.3 ± 2.3*** 2.9 ± 0.1
22:6(n–3) 4.0 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 0.4 25.0 ± 1.2***
∑ SFAs 43.5 ± 1.7 32.4 ± 2.9* 23.0 ± 1.2
∑ MUFAs 28.8 ± 3.9 20.0 ± 0.6 22.6 ± 0.1
∑ (n–3) PUFAs 9.0 ± 1.6 38.5 ± 2.7*** 28.5 ± 1.1***
∑ (n–6) PUFAs 18.7 ± 3.8 9.1 ± 0.8* 10.8 ± 0.3
1

B cells were treated with BSA or 25 μmol EPA or DHA/L for 24 h. Data are means ± SEMs from 5 independent experiments. Values (arbitrary units) are percentage of total FAs. Asterisks indicate statistical significance relative to the BSA control: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.