Table 1.
Subjec | FLT3 Genotype | Best marrow blast (%) | Baseline karyotype response | Karyotype at response | Cooperating mutations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Differentiation response | |||||
1009-01 | FLT3-ITD | 10 | 46,XY | 46,XY | DNMT3A*, NPM1, ASXL1, IDH1 |
1009-02 | FLT3-ITD | 15 | 46,XX | 46,XX | DNMT3A, NPM1, TET2 |
1009-14 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XY | 46,XY | DNMT3A, NPM1 |
1009-04 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XX | 46,XX | DNMT3A, NPM1, WT1, ATM* |
1009-07 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XX | 46,XX | DNMT3A, NPM1 |
1009-09 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XY | 46,XY | DNMT3A, NPM1, TET2 |
1009-11 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XX | 46,XX | DNMT3A, NPM1, TET2 |
1009-10 | FLT3-WT | <5 | 46,XY | 46,XY | TET2 |
1009-21 | FLT3-ITD | 10 | 46,XY,+11 | 46,XY,+11 | DNMT3A, ASXL1 |
Cytotoxic response | |||||
1009-06 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | Complex | 46,XY | Not evaluable |
1009-03 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | Hyperdiploid/complex | 46,XX | DNMT3A, RUNX1 |
1009-13 | FLT3-WT | <5 | Complex | 46,XY | TP53, NOTCH1 |
1009-12 | FLT3-WT | <5 | Complex | 46,XY | Not evaluable |
1009-17 | FLT3-WT | <5 | Complex | Complex | TP53, JAK2 |
1009-19 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | Complex | No growth | No mutations |
1009-08 | FLT3-ITD | <10 | Complex | Complex | RUNX1 |
1009-18 | FLT3-ITD | <5 | 46,XY, t(8;21),(q22;q22) with multiple additional abnormalities | 46,XY, t(8;21),(q22;q22) with multiple additional abnormalities | TET2* |
1009-16 | FLT3-ITD | 15 | 46,XY,del(5)(q23q33) | 46,XY,del(5)(q23q33) | ATM* |
1009-15 | FLT3-ITD | 70 | 47,XX,+8,del(16)(q13) | 47,XX,+8,del(16)(q13) | DNMT3A, NPM1 |
Abbreviations: FLT3, Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3; ITD, internal tandem duplication. Genetic and cytogenetic studies at baseline and best response are shown. Responding patients with normal karyotype uniformly showed differentiation response. Patients with differentiation response had a statistically significant increase in the incidence of NPM1 mutations (odds ratio (OR) = 24.5, P<0.01) and/or DNMT3A (OR = 10.5, P<0.05, Fisher’s exact test). One subject with rapidly progressive leukemia and one with unclassifiable response due to low baseline blast content are not shown. FLT3-ITD and D835 mutations were detected using fluorescent primers and multiplexed PCR amplification followed by capillary electrophoresis and/or EcoRV digestion resistance assay by published methods. Allelic ratios of FLT3-ITD to the WT sequence were calculated using peak area (GeneMapper Software, Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA). DNA was additionally extracted from cryopreserved blast samples and analyzed by next-generation sequencing for 23 genes commonly mutated in AML.15 Briefly, sequencing was done using an amplicon-based capture protocol (Luminex, Grand Island, NY, USA) with sequencing using MiSeq. Average depth of coverage was over 2000X and minimum depth was 250X. Sensitivity for mutations was 4% for all mutations other than FLT3-ITD, which was sensitive to a variant allele frequency of 1%. With the exception of variants of unclear significance (VOUS)—as indicated by asterisk—all gene mutations listed are recurrent pathogeneic sequence alterations as referenced by public databases, including dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/), the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic) and the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org). Statistical analyses did not include VOUS.