Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2016 May 30;13(7):557–562. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3891

Table 1.

Percentage of cells scored without visible OSER whorls as a function of FP-CytERM fusion protein, ranked from the most monomeric (100%) to the most strongly oligomeric (0%).

Fluorescent Protein % Normal Cells % StDev
mEGFP (L221K) 98.8 1.2
mEGFP (A206K) 98.1 1.6
mEmerald (A206K) 96.6 1.1
mRFP1 95.8 1.1
mT-Sapphire (A206K) 95.5 0.6
mApple 95.3 1.7
mPapaya 95.1 1.1
mCherry 95.0 0.8
CyPet 94.0 2.4
mKate2.5 93.9 1.7
mCitrine (A206K) 93.8 2.6
mTurquoise2 (A206K) 93.8 1.0
mTurquoise (A206K) 93.3 1.2
mRuby 93.1 2.1
mCerulean (A206K) 92.6 2.0
mTFP1 92.0 1.5
mTopaz (A206K) 91.9 2.0
mOrange2 91.8 1.4
FusionRed 91.5 3.0
mPlum 91.5 2.4
mOrange 91.4 1.7
mCerulean3 (A206K) 91.0 1.8
mStrawberry 90.6 2.5
mClover (A206K) 90.5 4.5
mNeonGreen 90.4 2.1
mEos3d.2G16 90.4 2.4
mAzamiGreen 90.3 4.7
mAmetrine 90.0 4.5
mRaspberry 89.6 4.0
mPapaya2 87.6 3.2
mRuby2 87.4 5.8
mWasabi 86.4 2.5
mVenus (A206K) 83.9 4.4
mKate2 81.1 6.1
Cerulean (A206) 78.3 4.8
EGFP (A206) 76.5 6.9
Clover (A206) 72.9 5.5
mKO2 68.4 4.2
Topaz (A206) 63.8 8.0
tdTurboRFP 62.5 9.4
YPet (A206) 62.5 5.2
Superfolder GFP (A206V) 62.4 6.3
Emerald (A206) 58.9 5.5
mTagRFP 57.7 7.5
tdTomato 57.6 4.9
EBFP2 (A206) 57.0 2.7
mKate 54.5 4.8
mEos3dG16 53.3 7.8
mTagBFP2 49.8 1.9
mKO 46.9 6.1
MiCy 41.7 10.7
mCardinal 41.3 3.6
mTagRFP-T 41.2 4.0
mNeptune 40.5 3.8
Venus (A206) 36.5 3.5
Citrine (A206) 36.2 3.9
tdKatushka 30.6 5.9
acGFP 29.5 12.4
TurboRFP 0.0 0.0
dKatushka 0.0 0.0
DsRed2 0.0 0.0
zsYellow 0.0 0.0
AsRed 0.0 0.0