Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;6(2):220–227. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0381-5

Table 1.

Multiple health behavior change (MHBC) research priorities for general and underserved/minority populations

General population Underserved/minority population
Rank Type Item N Meana SD Rank Type Item N Meana SD
1 INT Sustainability 74 4.58 0.66 1 INT Sustainability 70 4.59 0.63
2 INT Long-term effects 75 4.51 0.71 2 TH Predictors of behavior change 71 4.45 0.75
3 TH Predictors of behavior change 76 4.36 0.73 3 INT Dissemination/translation 70 4.44 0.77
4 INT Dissemination/translation 75 4.36 0.71 4 INT Long-term effects 67 4.43 0.76
5 TH Mediator of behavior change 75 4.35 0.74 5 INT Feasibility 69 4.38 0.73
6 INT Integration of behaviors 74 4.35 0.69 6 INT Tailored programs 70 4.37 0.82
7 INT Feasibility 75 4.31 0.77 7 TH Moderators of behavior change 70 4.36 0.76
8 TH Moderators of behavior change 76 4.29 0.75 8 TH Mediator of behavior change 71 4.31 0.82
9 TH Influence of one behavior to another 75 4.27 0.79 9 INT Recruitment and retention 70 4.31** 0.77
10 TH Common predictors across behaviors 76 4.24 0.85 10 TH Common predictors across behaviors 70 4.27 0.76
11 INT Tailored programs 75 4.23 0.80 11 TH Influence of one behavior to another 71 4.23 0.81
12 MS Validation of instruments 76 4.09 1.01 12 INT Integration of behaviors 69 4.23 0.81
13 INT Cost 75 4.05 0.85 13 INT Cost 70 4.23 0.85
14 INT Treatment fidelity 75 3.97 0.85 14 MS Validation of instruments 70 4.17 0.98
15 INT Co-action of behaviors 75 3.91 0.72 15 MS Multi-behavioral indices 70 4.10** 0.84
16 INT Recruitment and retention 75 3.87** 0.86 16 MS Measurement burden 70 4.01** 0.94
17 INT Simultaneous v. sequential 75 3.84 0.75 17 INT Treatment fidelity 70 3.99 0.93
18 MS Statistical techniques 76 3.79 0.97 18 INT Co-action of behaviors 70 3.93 0.73
19 MS Multi-behavioral indices 76 3.75** 0.91 19 INT Simultaneous v. sequential 70 3.91 0.78
20 TH MHBC Theory/models 76 3.64 1.06 20 TH MHBC Theory/models 71 3.80 0.97
21 TH Theory testing 75 3.64 1.05 21 MS Statistical techniques 70 3.74 1.03
22 MS Measurement burden 75 3.56** 0.99 22 TH Theory testing 71 3.72 1.00
23 TH Theory comparison 76 3.34 1.04 23 MS Equating units of behavioral measures 70 3.57 1.11
24 MS Equating units of behavioral measures 76 3.33 1.12 24 TH Theory comparison 70 3.50 1.03

TH theory, MS measurement, INT intervention

aScale: 1 = not at all important, 2 = a little important, 3 = moderately important, 4 = very important, 5 = extremely important

**Paired t test was used to compare the mean difference between the general population and the underserved population for each item, significant at p < 0.002 using the Bonferroni method for multiple comparison adjustment (p = 0.05/24 items)